Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Notice of Voluntarily retirement does not require corresponding acceptance of appointing authority: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Notice of Voluntarily retirement does not require corresponding acceptance of appointing authority: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
September 3, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The appeal stands allowed and the impugned order dated 8.7.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. No.13815/2021 is hereby se

The petitioner in order to avail the undue benefit of the scheme has filed the belated return by contending that the filing of such belated return is permissible and claimed the deduction of income as well as the refund of the tax: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The petitioner in order to avail the undue benefit of the scheme has filed the belated return by contending that the filing of such belated return is permissible and claimed the deduction of income as well as the refund of the tax: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
September 3, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The court is not inclined to interfere with the order dated 29.03.2001 passed by the Commissioner, Income-tax. Hence, Writ Petition is hereby dismi

The information wrongly given by the petitioner was not a very material information: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
September 3, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to consider the candidature of petitioner for the post of Office Assistant (Multi-purpose) and

As a result, it is held that the trial Court has not committed any error in rejecting the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC filed by the non-applicants: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
September 2, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The revision being devoid of merits is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of AKHILESH ANJANA V. KAVITA ANJANA t

It has been found that the property in question has been sold on a very lower price. The allegation against the present applicant pertains to misuse of her post: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
It has been found that the property in question has been sold on a very lower price. The allegation against the present applicant pertains to misuse of her post: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
September 2, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The present criminal revision stands dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of DEEPALI JADHAV V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADE

Validity of report of Superintendent of Police that the accused is involved in criminal activities and many crimes are registered against him – District Magistrate has not recorded his satisfaction that witnesses are not willing to come forward to give evidence in public due to apprehension of their safety: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
September 2, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ petition is allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of LACCHU @ LAXMAN V. STATE OF MP and ORS through HON’BLE

The courts have the authority to use their discretion to excuse the delay if the justifications are open and compelling: Madras High Court
The courts have the authority to use their discretion to excuse the delay if the justifications are open and compelling: Madras High Court
September 2, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The courts have the authority to use their discretion to excuse the delay if the justifications are open and compelling is upheld by the Madras Hig

We must stop using the two-finger test as a diagnostic tool. We discover that the two-finger test is frequently applied to young victims of sexual offences: Madras High Court
We must stop using the two-finger test as a diagnostic tool. We discover that the two-finger test is frequently applied to young victims of sexual offences: Madras High Court
September 2, 2022by Primelegal Team0

We must stop using the two-finger test as a diagnostic tool. We discover that the two-finger test is frequently applied to young victims of sexual

The petitioner is required to challenge the order of termination before the Labour Court in accordance with law: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The petitioner is required to challenge the order of termination before the Labour Court in accordance with law: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
September 1, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The petition is disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of NEERAJ V. SUDHIR AGRAWAL through HON’BLE JUSTICE VIVEK R

Before convicting the accused with the aid of Section 149 of the IPC, the Court must give a clear finding regarding the nature of the common object and that the object was unlawful. Before recording a conviction u/s. 149 of IPC, essential ingredients of Section 141 of IPC must be established: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
September 1, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The criminal appeal is partly allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of RAJENDRA SINGH V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH throug