Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
This Court finds that when the petitioner came to know about the suit, the petitioner has taken appropriate steps but the Learned Advocate had not appeared and not moved the application, the petitioner should not suffer from ex-parte-decree: Calcutta High Court
December 15, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Calcutta High Court opined the above-mentioned in the case Chirantan Housing Pvt. Ltd. v. Youdhister Kumar Dhanania, IA No. GA/2/2021 in CS/29/

CONTINUE READING
THE FIR DISCLOSES THAT THE SECOND RESPONDENT’S SON WAS NOT ALLOWED TO PLAY IN THE GROUND BECAUSE OF HIS CASTE. POLITICAL RIVALRY IS JUST A DEFENCE PROJECTED BY THE APPELLANT AT THIS STAGE, WHICH REQUIRES INVESTIGATION SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
THE FIR DISCLOSES THAT THE SECOND RESPONDENT’S SON WAS NOT ALLOWED TO PLAY IN THE GROUND BECAUSE OF HIS CASTE. POLITICAL RIVALRY IS JUST A DEFENCE PROJECTED BY THE APPELLANT AT THIS STAGE, WHICH REQUIRES INVESTIGATION SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 15, 2022by Primelegal Team

  In the matter of Ganesha L D vs State By on 23 November, 2022 (CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1816 OF 2022) presided by the hon’ble justice Sreenivas Hari

CONTINUE READING
IN ORDER TO TAKE THE CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE, THERE MUST BE COGENT EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT, UNLESS THE DRIVER HAS BEEN EXAMINED. HE IS THE RIGHT PERSON TO SPEAK WITH REGARD TO THE CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE IS CONCERNED AND NO SUCH EVIDENCE HAS BEEN LED BEFORE THE COURT SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 15, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the matter of M/S. Oriental Insurance Company … vs Laxmamma on 23 November, 2022(M.F.A.NO.2841/2013 (MV-D)) presided by The hon’ble just

CONTINUE READING
This court finds that the judgment relied by the plaintiff is distinguishable and the judgment relied by the defendants are squarely applicable in the instant case: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Mukesh Jaiswal  v. Phool Chand Gupta and Ors, IA NO. GA/2/2022 in CS/211/2019 presi

CONTINUE READING
Moreover the act of charging interest at different rates on different periods, goes to show non-application of mind by respondent authority.: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

The statement was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Bmw Industries Ltd vs Uco Bank & Ors, WPO 146 of 2020 presided over by Justi

CONTINUE READING
Customs Summons u/s 108 directly to Managing Director untenable: Guwahati High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

Guwahati High Court on 18th May 2022 said Summoning of the MD should be take on only as a last resort in cases where assesses are not cooperating o

CONTINUE READING
Section 173 of CrPC does not prescribe piecemeal investigation: Gauhati High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

Gauhati High Court on 27th October 2022 said that Sec 173 of the CrPC does not prescribe piecemeal investigation & filing of incomplete charge

CONTINUE READING
SEATS RESERVED FOR DISABILITY QUOTA NOT GIVEN KARNATAKA HC GRANTS JUSTICE BY GIVING THEM A CHANCE TO APPEAR FOR ROUNDS
SEATS RESERVED FOR DISABILITY QUOTA NOT GIVEN KARNATAKA HC GRANTS JUSTICE BY GIVING THEM A CHANCE TO APPEAR FOR ROUNDS
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the matter of Sri Nandeesh C M vs National Medical Commission on 25 November, 2022(W.P.No.22910/2022 (EDN-MED-ADM) observed by The hon’ble jud

CONTINUE READING
ACCUSED FLATLY DENIED TO COMPLY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT AND AS SUCH, WE ARE LEFT WITH NO CHOICE BUT TO HOLD THE ACCUSED-RESPONDENT GUILTY FOR AN ACT OF WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT AND COMMITTING CONTEMPT OF THIS COURT SYAS: KARNATAKA HC
ACCUSED FLATLY DENIED TO COMPLY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT AND AS SUCH, WE ARE LEFT WITH NO CHOICE BUT TO HOLD THE ACCUSED-RESPONDENT GUILTY FOR AN ACT OF WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT AND COMMITTING CONTEMPT OF THIS COURT SYAS: KARNATAKA HC
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the matter of Sri A N Ravi Kumar vs Sri B Manjunath on 24 November, 2022(C. C. C. NO. 663 OF 2022 (CIVIL)) presided by THE HON’BLE JUSTICE Chi

CONTINUE READING
“THERE IS NO INJUSTICE DONE TO THE PETITIONERS. THEY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED AS TENANTS UNDER SECTION 9A OF THE ACT. THEIR POSSESSION CANNOT BE DISTURBED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT. THEY WILL VIRTUALLY BECOME THE OWNERS BY REASON OF THE SAID REGISTRATION. THIS IS SUFFICIENT TO REJECT THE PETITION.” SAYS : KARNATAKA HC
“THERE IS NO INJUSTICE DONE TO THE PETITIONERS. THEY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED AS TENANTS UNDER SECTION 9A OF THE ACT. THEIR POSSESSION CANNOT BE DISTURBED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT. THEY WILL VIRTUALLY BECOME THE OWNERS BY REASON OF THE SAID REGISTRATION. THIS IS SUFFICIENT TO REJECT THE PETITION.” SAYS : KARNATAKA HC
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the matter of Sri. B.C. Ravindra vs The Chairman Land Tribunal on 24 November, 2022(WRIT PETITION NO.59736 OF 2014(LR) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.2744

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.