Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“Be Careful In Future,” The High Court advises in response to the judgement of the trial court that included the name of the alleged rape victim: Allahabad High Court
“Be Careful In Future,” The High Court advises in response to the judgement of the trial court that included the name of the alleged rape victim: Allahabad High Court
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case title – Bablu @ Jitendra And Another vs. State of U.P [CRIMINAL APPEAL No. – 1201 of 2021]   The Allahabad High Court recentl

“His Intention Is To Harass Wife”: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Husband’s Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Filed By Wife: High Court
“His Intention Is To Harass Wife”: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Husband’s Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Filed By Wife: High Court
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Calcutta High Court recently denied a man’s request to transfer Section 125 CrPC proceedings that his wife had started before the Burdwan

“Live-in relationship cannot be at the cost of social fabric of this country”: Rajasthan High Court.
“Live-in relationship cannot be at the cost of social fabric of this country”: Rajasthan High Court.
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

“Live-in relationship cannot be at the cost of social fabric of this country”: Rajasthan High Court.   The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed

Woman Married To Gay Man ‘Aggrieved Person’ Under DV Act, Mumbai Court Upholds Order On Grant Of Maintenance To Wife: MUMBAI COURT
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

A sessions court upheld an order for a “gay” man to pay maintenance to his separated wife, reasoning that the phrase “aggrieved p

No doubt that no period of limitation has been provided for filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India but the constitutional courts have devised a self-imposed restraint that the jurisdiction under Article 226, which is an extraordinary, equitable discretionary jurisdiction should not be exercised in favour of the persons, who approach the court after a long lapse of time without offering any cogent explanation for the delay.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 30th of December, 2022 in which it quashed the writ petition filed by the petitio

Collegium System in India
Collegium System in India
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

This article discusses the techniques used to appoint judges in the Judiciary. The nomination of judges is a crucial part of judicial independence,

The Passport Manual issued for smooth functioning is only guidelines or solutions to answer circumstances that would emerge, but it cannot run counter to the statute including rules: Karnataka High Court
The Passport Manual issued for smooth functioning is only guidelines or solutions to answer circumstances that would emerge, but it cannot run counter to the statute including rules: Karnataka High Court
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka HC said under Justice M Nagaprasanna in S. Nancy Nithya v. The Government of India and others (Writ Petition No. 22378 of 2022) that

State’s decision to exclude private sector employees from BH-series registration for vehicles is erroneous: Karnataka High Court
State’s decision to exclude private sector employees from BH-series registration for vehicles is erroneous: Karnataka High Court
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court passed a judgement on 16.12.22 quashing the State’s decision to exclude Private Sector employees From BH-Series Registra

This is a contempt proceeding brought against the former Chief Minister of Orissa, Sri Naba Krishna Choudhury, for a speech he gave in the Orissa Legislative Assembly on March 8, 1956. On 10-3-1956, an excerpt from the speech was published in the local daily ‘Matrubhumi’. The Editor, Printer, and Publisher of the said daily were also summoned to show cause why they should not be imprisoned for contempt, but they both offered an unqualified apology. – Odisha High Court.
This is a contempt proceeding brought against the former Chief Minister of Orissa, Sri Naba Krishna Choudhury, for a speech he gave in the Orissa Legislative Assembly on March 8, 1956. On 10-3-1956, an excerpt from the speech was published in the local daily ‘Matrubhumi’. The Editor, Printer, and Publisher of the said daily were also summoned to show cause why they should not be imprisoned for contempt, but they both offered an unqualified apology. – Odisha High Court.
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Odisha High Court on 26.02.1958 passed a judgement for the proceeding for contempt started against the former Chief Minister of Orissa, Sri Nab

In the absence of any definition of the expression “re- employment” and applying the common parlance theory: Delhi High Court
In the absence of any definition of the expression “re- employment” and applying the common parlance theory: Delhi High Court
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

An instant writ petition under was filed in the High Court of Delhi under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner was seeking the reliefs o