Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court is dismissed: Rajasthan High Court
Liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court is dismissed: Rajasthan High Court
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Omprakash Kalwa versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. Case No.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5413/2023 Decided on: 21/07/2023 Coram: HON

Defence Establishments is strictly governed the parameters and revised by the Defence Experts.: Rajasthan High Court
Defence Establishments is strictly governed the parameters and revised by the Defence Experts.: Rajasthan High Court
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Bhanwar Lal Bhadiyar  versus UOI & Anr Case No.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3401/2023 Decided on: 17/07/2023 Coram: HON’BL

Universities to operate the reserve waiting list in accordance with the provisions: Rajasthan High Court
Universities to operate the reserve waiting list in accordance with the provisions: Rajasthan High Court
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Dr. Priyanka Joshi versus  Sri Karan Narendra  & Ors. Case No.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26876/2018 Decided on: 24.07.2023 Co

There was no negligence on their part but non-claimants: Rajasthan High Court
There was no negligence on their part but non-claimants: Rajasthan High Court
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Satyapal S/o Kishorilal & Ors. versus Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd & Anr. Case No.: S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 85/2012 Decid

The court emphasizes the importance of protecting personal liberty under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution and warns against using preventive detention as a substitute for ordinary criminal law.
The court emphasizes the importance of protecting personal liberty under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution and warns against using preventive detention as a substitute for ordinary criminal law.
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case- Bharatbhai Vallabhbhai Golani … vs State Of Gujara Decided on: 3rd may CORAM: HON’BLE Justice A.S.Supeiah Introduction The presen

Patna High Court dismissed an appeal on the ground that the appellant did not satisfy the eligibility requirement for teachers training course
Patna High Court dismissed an appeal on the ground that the appellant did not satisfy the eligibility requirement for teachers training course
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: Mina Kumari v. The State of Bihar & Ors. Decided on: 17-07-2023 LPA No: 493/2021 CWJC No: 17598/2019 Coram: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Acquittal granted by Punjab high court charged under section 3 of the ST and SC Act,due to inadequate evidence produced by prosecution
Acquittal granted by Punjab high court charged under section 3 of the ST and SC Act,due to inadequate evidence produced by prosecution
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: Rajbir Singh v State of Punjab    Decided On-:June 7, 2023 CRA-S-2323-SB-2006 (O&M) CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. N.S Shekawat INTRODUC

No tolerance when addressing the bail requests of cyber thugs in cybercrime cases.- Punjab high court
No tolerance when addressing the bail requests of cyber thugs in cybercrime cases.- Punjab high court
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: Gurmeet Singh v State of Punjab    Decided On-:21.07.2023 CRM-M-46621-2022 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Anoop Chitkara INTRODUCTION- The p

It is well established by law that an employer has the sole authority to decide whether to keep a position or not.– Punjab high court
It is well established by law that an employer has the sole authority to decide whether to keep a position or not.– Punjab high court
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: Manoj Kumar Verma v Management Board of Ansal Institute of Technology   Decided On-:01.05.2023 CWP No. 27944 of 2013 CORAM: Hon’ble Justi

Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MHG IP HOLDINGS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, DELHI Date of Decision: 18th July, 2023 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 49/20