Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Madras High Court in a case about a Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution concluded that the subjective satisfaction reached by the Authority regarding the detenu’s potential bail was impaired.
The Madras High Court in a case about a Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution concluded that the subjective satisfaction reached by the Authority regarding the detenu’s potential bail was impaired.
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  DATED : 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL   Introduction: The case of Reeta Mary v

The Madras High Court releases accused on bail upon executing a bond of Rs. 25,000 along with specific conditions in a case filed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
The Madras High Court releases accused on bail upon executing a bond of Rs. 25,000 along with specific conditions in a case filed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.A.(MD).No.658 of 2023 Introduction: The case of State of Tamil Nadu v. Dha

The Madras High court applied Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and compounded the offense under Section 138 in judgement regarding a dishonoured cheque
The Madras High court applied Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and compounded the offense under Section 138 in judgement regarding a dishonoured cheque
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Rajesh v. Sathish Kumar Dated : 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.R.C.(MD).No.904 of 2023 Introduction: The case of

The Designs Act of 2000 does not extend protection beyond what is required to create a mandatory incentive for design activity: Delhi High Court
The Designs Act of 2000 does not extend protection beyond what is required to create a mandatory incentive for design activity: Delhi High Court
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED Vs SHREE AMBA INDUSTRIES Decided on:  16th August, 2023 +  CS(COMM) 1078/2018 & I.A. 11007/2018 (O-XXVI R-9 o

Delhi High Court’s Jurisdictional Ruling: Venue vs Seat of Arbitration and Time Extension for Arbitral Proceedings
Delhi High Court’s Jurisdictional Ruling: Venue vs Seat of Arbitration and Time Extension for Arbitral Proceedings
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Reliance Infrastructure Limited v. Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Decided on:  14th August, 2023 +  O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 161/20

Bombay HC upholds conviction under Sec. 302 IPC of the appellant by a child’s testimony
Bombay HC upholds conviction under Sec. 302 IPC of the appellant by a child’s testimony
August 17, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Nijam S/o. Chindhu Tadvi v. State of Maharashtra Decided on: 10.08.2023 + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2022 CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND AB

Bombay High Court: Imposition of LBT which was due before GST came into force is valid
Bombay High Court: Imposition of LBT which was due before GST came into force is valid
August 17, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Wintry Engineering & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Decided on: AUGUST 08, 2023 WRIT PETITION NO. 9988 OF 2023 C

Over 6-Year Period of Consensual Sexual Relations Deemed Not as Rape by Karnataka High Court.
Over 6-Year Period of Consensual Sexual Relations Deemed Not as Rape by Karnataka High Court.
August 17, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Girinath B And State of Karnataka & Others Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION No.6863 OF 2022 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION No.6485 OF 2022 Date of

The Karnataka High Court Has Declined To Dismiss A Case Of Abetment Of Suicide Against Three Individuals Accused Of Taunting A Coworker Based On Their Sexual Orientation.
The Karnataka High Court Has Declined To Dismiss A Case Of Abetment Of Suicide Against Three Individuals Accused Of Taunting A Coworker Based On Their Sexual Orientation.
August 17, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Malathy S B & Others AND State of Karnataka Case No: WP 11745/2023 Date of Order: 28-07-2023 CORAM: HON’BLE JUSTICE JUSTICE M NAG

Protection to a lesbian couple, affirming that Article 21 remains applicable even when individuals of the same gender choose to reside together.
Protection to a lesbian couple, affirming that Article 21 remains applicable even when individuals of the same gender choose to reside together.
August 17, 2023by Primelegal Team0

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT Pooja & Anr. Vs. Union of India 2023:PHHC:105975 Coram HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA DATE: 17.08.202