Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Filing of a FIR or FIRs by itself cannot be connected to a violation of maintaining public order : Gujarat High court
Filing of a FIR or FIRs by itself cannot be connected to a violation of maintaining public order : Gujarat High court
August 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Ghanshyam Derubhai Budhelia v State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 11, 2023 12589 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia and Mr.

If the petitioner cannot demonstrate “illegal detention/confinement,” the habeas corpus petition will not be accepted. Gujarat High court
If the petitioner cannot demonstrate “illegal detention/confinement,” the habeas corpus petition will not be accepted. Gujarat High court
August 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Lilabhai shankarbhai sapriya v State of Gujarat Decided On-: 01/08/2023 7864 of 2020 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Umesh A. Trivedi  and M

No pertinent or convincing evidence, the authority cannot take legal action for the breach of maintaining public order under section 3 (1) of the Act. : Gujarat high court
No pertinent or convincing evidence, the authority cannot take legal action for the breach of maintaining public order under section 3 (1) of the Act. : Gujarat high court
August 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Dipakbhai Madhavbhai Baraiya v State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 11, 2023 12592 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia and Mr

The Court cannot grant pre-arrest bail due to the seriousness and nature of the offense and the relevant facts – Gujarat High Court
The Court cannot grant pre-arrest bail due to the seriousness and nature of the offense and the relevant facts – Gujarat High Court
August 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Nipulbhai Gangdasbhai Santoki  v State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 9, 2023 12391 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. J.C Doshi INTROD

Role of AI in Judging: Advantages and Disadvantages
Role of AI in Judging: Advantages and Disadvantages
August 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Introduction The modern world is witnessing an era of technological advancements that are reshaping various sectors of society. With the introducti

Bombay HC:  Disqualification under Section 14 (1) (j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act is invalid if it is based merely on some encroachment claim
Bombay HC: Disqualification under Section 14 (1) (j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act is invalid if it is based merely on some encroachment claim
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Sunita w/o Ramkrushna Pandalwad v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Decided on: 09.08.2023 + WRIT PETITION NO. 8956 OF 2023 CORAM: KISHORE C.

Bombay High Court: No claim for reservation can be made simultaneously in two different categories
Bombay High Court: No claim for reservation can be made simultaneously in two different categories
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Pradeep Bapurao Mohite Patil v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Decided on: 18.08.2023 WRIT PETITION NO. 1736 OF

Karnataka High Court Establishes Parties’ Legal Rights Upon Filing Lawsuit, Subsequent Developments Do Not Impact Jurisdiction
Karnataka High Court Establishes Parties’ Legal Rights Upon Filing Lawsuit, Subsequent Developments Do Not Impact Jurisdiction
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Krishnaprasad A AND L Doreswamy Case No: HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO.10/2022 Date of Order: 11-08-2023 INTRODUCTION The Karnataka High

During the Preliminary Decree phase, a buyer who owns an undivided interest does not possess the authority to influence a partition lawsuit, as stated by the Karnataka High Court
During the Preliminary Decree phase, a buyer who owns an undivided interest does not possess the authority to influence a partition lawsuit, as stated by the Karnataka High Court
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Vinayak Metrani And Gadigevva @ Neelavva & Others Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 106032 OF 2022 CORAM: HON’BLE JUSTICE SACHIN SHA

The Madras High Court held that the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act stood compounded under Section 147 of the same Act.   
The Madras High Court held that the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act stood compounded under Section 147 of the same Act.  
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Dated : 17.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.R.C(MD)No.279 of 2022   Introduction: The case of S. Madan v. T. Dhanam re