Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The purpose of preventing the occurrence of another acid-related incident, the law prohibiting its sale should go into effect right away.
The purpose of preventing the occurrence of another acid-related incident, the law prohibiting its sale should go into effect right away.
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

ABSTRACT Violence against women can be perpetrated in both ways i.e., mentally and physically. This paper talks about the exact same violence calle

Prima-facie evidence of the current applicant’s involvement in the pertinent offence,  calls for a thorough investigation.: Gujarat High Court
Prima-facie evidence of the current applicant’s involvement in the pertinent offence, calls for a thorough investigation.: Gujarat High Court
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Sanjaysinh Batuksinh Vaghela Versus State of Gujara Decided On-: August 17, 2023 4329 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Nizar S Desai I

Anticipatory bail rejected the accused under sections 406,420 and 120 due to the gravity of offence: Gujarat High Court
Anticipatory bail rejected the accused under sections 406,420 and 120 due to the gravity of offence: Gujarat High Court
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Sandipbhai Bhikhubhai Padsala Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 17, 2023 7336 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Nizar S Desai

The prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused—a public official, banker, or agent—was given access to property that he was legally obligated: Gujarat High Court
The prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused—a public official, banker, or agent—was given access to property that he was legally obligated: Gujarat High Court
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Girishbhai Ambalal Rathod Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 17, 2023 30834 of 2016 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. J.C Doshi INTROD

Disruption of law and order that results in disorder is not always enough to justify action under the Preventive Detention Act, : Gujarat High Court
Disruption of law and order that results in disorder is not always enough to justify action under the Preventive Detention Act, : Gujarat High Court
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE:  Sikandar Ishakbhai Shaikh Versus Additional Director General of Police Decided On-: August 17, 2023 12289 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble

The Gujarat HC overturned the NCLT’s order rejecting Vodafone’s refund application under Section 54(5) of the CGST Act, 2017
The Gujarat HC overturned the NCLT’s order rejecting Vodafone’s refund application under Section 54(5) of the CGST Act, 2017
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Vodafone Mobile Services Limited V Union of India Decided On-: August 10, 2023 1345 of 2021 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Biren and Mr. Dev

It is high time that the State Authorities reflect on their action of passing detention orders in a hasty manner Observed :Gujarat High court
It is high time that the State Authorities reflect on their action of passing detention orders in a hasty manner Observed :Gujarat High court
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE:  Shankarbhai Dhirubhai Vaghela v State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 11, 2023 10603 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehi

The Madras High Court emphasized that the quality of evidence was more important than the quantity in a case involving financial fraud
The Madras High Court emphasized that the quality of evidence was more important than the quantity in a case involving financial fraud
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  Dated: 22.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.30022 of 2022   Introduction: The case of State v. K. Mohanraj an

The Madras High Court held that it was imperative for the investigation to proceed and for the report to be submitted by the investigating officer.
The Madras High Court held that it was imperative for the investigation to proceed and for the report to be submitted by the investigating officer.
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  Dated :23.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.18847 of 2023   Introduction: The case of N. Aswathaman v. Stat

Bombay HC:  Sweepers employed through contractors are   “employees” eligible for permanency benefits
Bombay HC: Sweepers employed through contractors are “employees” eligible for permanency benefits
August 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Municipal Corporation of City of Jalgaon v. Miraj Mahila Audyogik Cooperative Society Ltd., & Ors. Decided on: 22.08.2023 + WRIT PETITIO