Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
High Court of Patna Set Aside The order Passed by the learned trial court under section 304-B of IPC as proper evidence to proof the offence
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE-Rajan Sah Vs The State of Bihar Decided on-21/12/2023 +CR.APP(DB)No.1439/2023 CORAM-HON’BLE JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR AND HON’BLE JU

The High Court of Patna set aside the judgement and decree of the appellate court as it appears that the appellate court has failed to exercise it’s power and jurisdiction
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE- Shree Kishun Rai & ors Vs Ram Dulari Devi & ors  DECIDED on-22/12/2023 SA+402/2000 CORAM-HON’BLE JUSTICE KHATIM REZA 

The recover of excess payment from the retired employee after a long time is held to be impermissible in law – High Court of Patna
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE-Nirmal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar DECIDED on-22/12/2023 +CWJC No.15555/2022 CORAM-HON’BLE JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR  FACT As per th

Review application is not valid for an order passed by a Quasi Judicial Body : Bombay HC
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Sitara Anil Sharma V The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Madhav J Jamdar DATE :  19th   December, 2023 CITA

The writ petition of a medical practitioner was quashed and his clinic was seized on the grounds of noncompliance with the regulations of the Medical Endorsement Act.
The writ petition of a medical practitioner was quashed and his clinic was seized on the grounds of noncompliance with the regulations of the Medical Endorsement Act.
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Sri. DR.  Annaiah. N v State of Karnataka and ors. Citation: WP No. 23267 of 2023 Decided: 20.10.2023 Corum: Justice M. Naga Prasanna   In

Proclamation against the accused was set aside when the time specified was less than 30 days to appear in a specific for an absconded accused : Bombay HC
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Deepak Sitaram Modhe v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sarang V Kotwal DATE :  22nd   December, 2023 CITATION : Criminal

The State bank of India has the statutory authority to forfeit the amount upon nonpayment of bidding money but it cannot exceed its limit and terms and conditions of the auction.
The State bank of India has the statutory authority to forfeit the amount upon nonpayment of bidding money but it cannot exceed its limit and terms and conditions of the auction.
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Sri Kalyana Murty K v State Bank of India Citation: WP No. 23327 of 2022 Decided on: 19.10.2023 Coram: Justice K.V Arvind   Introduction Th

Smt. Bhawna Vs. Hemsingh @ Tinchu
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Cruelty, if proven, is an actual cause of action for divorce: the court ruled that there is no legal requirement on the court to compel the restora

Mufti Qazi Jahangir Alam Qasmi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Concept of Parity: the court, emphasizing this concept, found that the appellant was entitled to be extended on bail, particularly because co-accus

Late Smt. Shanta Pagaria W/O Late … vs. Jaipur Development Authority
January 2, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Legal acquisition of the property…….. The court criticized the arbitrary actions of the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA), provided relief by