Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delhi High court granted bail to an accused under the offence of Kidnapping, as per their authority under section 439 of CrPC.

Title: Shah Alam vs State Govt. of NCT Delhi Reserved: 01.06.2023 Pronounced: 07.06.2023 BAIL APPLN. 1033/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS M

Delhi High court passed an order directing the Petitioner/tenants to pay use and occupation charges.

Title: MURARI CHAUHAN & ANR vs KAILASH NARAIN MALHOTRA Decided on: 21.06.2023 + RC.REV. 174/2019 & CM APPL. 13057/2019 and CM APPL. 40082/2

The Gujarat High Court Rejected Teesta Setalvad’s plea and ordered her to surrender IMMEDIATELY in police custody.
The Gujarat High Court Rejected Teesta Setalvad’s plea and ordered her to surrender IMMEDIATELY in police custody.

Teesta Atul Setalvad vs State Of Gujarat (R/CR.MA/14435/2022) Decided on: 1st July 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Nirzar Desai Introduction The

To be enforceable, a Lok Adalat Award must include all of the following features, says the High Court of Kerala
To be enforceable, a Lok Adalat Award must include all of the following features, says the High Court of Kerala

Case Title : Case Title: Vijaya K Vs. Muraleedharan K G Bench : HON’BLE MR. A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE, MRS. SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE O.P.NO.539/2007 Da

Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on IPR Laws in India
Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on IPR Laws in India

Introduction  The covid-19 pandemic has led to a dramatic loss of human life worldwide and presents an unprecedented challenge to the world of wor

Uniform Marriage Age of Men and Women.
Uniform Marriage Age of Men and Women.

Introdcution: The legal age of marriage in India is 18 for women and 21 for men. This has been the case since 1978, when the Prohibition of Child M

The Gujarat High Court finds that reinstatement is not feasible after such an extended period, but the awarded compensation needs improvement. Therefore, the court enhances the compensation amount to Rs.1,50,000/- to ensure justice.
The Gujarat High Court finds that reinstatement is not feasible after such an extended period, but the awarded compensation needs improvement. Therefore, the court enhances the compensation amount to Rs.1,50,000/- to ensure justice.

Case- Gordhanbhai Dhamabhai Patel vs Deputy Range Forest Officer Decided on: 27th  June 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Rajendra M. Sareen Intro

Circumstantial evidence may not lead to an accurate decision in the execution of justice says Punjab High Court
Circumstantial evidence may not lead to an accurate decision in the execution of justice says Punjab High Court

TITLE – Kaur v State of Punjab Decided On- :16.06.2023 CRR-684-2007 (O&M) CORAM:  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY INTRODUCTION –

The Rajasthan High Court reiterates that DNA paternity tests cannot be performed on a regular basis and must only be done under special circumstances.

TITLE: X versus Y Decided on 26/05/2023 2023/RJJD/016587 Coram: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Facts of the case: The parties got

The POCSO case against man dismissed by Rajasthan High Court because victim claims she was not abducted forcibly
The POCSO case against man dismissed by Rajasthan High Court because victim claims she was not abducted forcibly

TITLE: Ankit Jatav v. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. Decided on: 31/05/2023 CRLMP-3075/2023 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Facts of