Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Madras High Court has decided that as a result of the tax payable falling below the designated level of Rs. 3,000 after accounting for prepaid taxes that the prosecution under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act is not maintainable.
The Madras High Court has decided that as a result of the tax payable falling below the designated level of Rs. 3,000 after accounting for prepaid taxes that the prosecution under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act is not maintainable.
December 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Manav Menon Versus DCIT Case No: CRL.O.P.No.26013 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.Nos.14387 & 14390 of 2021 Decided on: 17 October, 2023 CORAM:

The Madras High Court accepted that the Foreign Tax Credit claim, arguing that proper compliance is demonstrated by completing Form-67 after the Income Tax Return is filed but prior to the issue of an intimation.
The Madras High Court accepted that the Foreign Tax Credit claim, arguing that proper compliance is demonstrated by completing Form-67 after the Income Tax Return is filed but prior to the issue of an intimation.
December 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy Versus PCIT Case No: W.P.No.5834 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.5925 and 5927 of 2022 Decided on: 06th October, 2023 CORA

The High Court of Calcutta endorsed order Cancelling the Appointment Of 94 Teachers Found Ineligible Under the 2014 Eligibility Test
December 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

WPA 9979 of 2022 Soumen Nandy vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Amrita Sinha Introduction The High Court of Calcu

The Reverse burden principle applicable in POCSO Cases, the cardinal principle of criminal law that the prosevution has to stand on its own leg and has to prove the case to the hilt, cannot be side-lined or by-passed- High Court of Patna
December 14, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  The Reverse burden principle applicable in POCSO Cases, the cardinal principle of criminal law that the prosecution has to stand on its own

The Madras High Court ruled that the family’s treatment by the authorities over the previous 36 years during which the widow of the dead employee also passed away as being inhumane in addition to being illegal.
The Madras High Court ruled that the family’s treatment by the authorities over the previous 36 years during which the widow of the dead employee also passed away as being inhumane in addition to being illegal.
December 14, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: The Chennai District Collector and Others v T.V.S. Jaya Perumal (Died) Case No: W.A.No.2445 of 2019 Decided on: 06th October, 2023 CORA

The Madras High Court has directed the State to furnish the bereaved families with adequate and just compensation in remembrance of those who lost their lives while working as frontline healthcare providers during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Madras High Court has directed the State to furnish the bereaved families with adequate and just compensation in remembrance of those who lost their lives while working as frontline healthcare providers during the Covid-19 pandemic.
December 14, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: N Ponnupillai v The State of Tamil Nadu Case No: W.P.(MD). No.8225 of 2021 Decided on: 22nd October, 2023 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS.JUST

Wife entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.PC if a man simply performs marital obligations : Bombay HC
December 14, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Alka Bhausaheb Bhad v Bhausaheb Ramrao Bhad and The state of Maharashtra CITATION : WP No 15368 of 2023 CORAM : Hon’ble justice Rajesh S.

Bonafide error in making GST return through GST forms should be allowed for rectification : Bombay HC
December 14, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Star Engineers Pvt. Ltd v Union of India CITATION : WP No 15368 of 2023 CORAM : Hon’ble justice G.S Kulkarni & Hon’ble justice Jite

Voluntary Resignation to be Considered automatic forfeiture of pension as per Rule 26 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972- Delhi HC
Voluntary Resignation to be Considered automatic forfeiture of pension as per Rule 26 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972- Delhi HC
December 14, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Khimji Bhai v UOI & Ors Decided on: 13th October, 2023 + W.P.(C) 13558/2023 & CM APPL.53576-53578/2023 CORAM: – HON’BLE MR.

Delhi High Court Instructed the Respondents to temporarily attach the petitioner to a Unit at Delhi for a period of three months so that he could be there for his wife during delivery and 2-3 weeks beyond the period of delivery.
Delhi High Court Instructed the Respondents to temporarily attach the petitioner to a Unit at Delhi for a period of three months so that he could be there for his wife during delivery and 2-3 weeks beyond the period of delivery.
December 14, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Himanshu Choudhary v Union of India and Ors Decided on: 11.10.2023 + W.P.(C) 12516/2023 & CM APPL. 49390/2023 CORAM: – HON’BLE M