Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
When response is provided within stipulated time as laid down in the RTI Act, appeal on the ground of delay of response considered Infructuous: SEBI.
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The Appellate Authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising Mr. Anand Baiwar, who adj

The payment of royalty has to be in consonance with Rule 21 of U.P. Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 1963: High Court of Uttarakhand.
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Even when the Memorandum of Understanding is silent on the point with regard to the payment of royalty, naturally, the payment of royalty would hav

Appellant released on bail  after being arrested under Sections 341/323/504/506/34 IPC and 3(1)(r)(s)/3(2)(ra) of the SC/ST Act: High court Of Patna
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The additional session judge on the 15/09/2020 passed an order rejecting the plea for anticipatory bail for the appellant therefore The counsel for

“The appellant had submitted that he had only sought the action taken/details of the proceedings and not sought details of the complaint.”: SEBI, Part 1.
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjud

“The appellant had submitted that he had only sought the action taken/details of the proceedings and not sought details of the complaint.”: SEBI, Part 2.
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

For the reasons stated in the appeal, the delay in filing this appeal is condoned. Appellate Authority, Mr. Baiwar had carefully considered the app

“The respondent observed that the queries are in the nature of seeking clarification/opinion and cannot be construed as “information”…”: SEBI, Part 1.
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjud

“The respondent observed that the queries are in the nature of seeking clarification/opinion and cannot be construed as “information”…”: SEBI, Part 2.
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The respondent, in response to the query numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, observed that the queries are in the nature of seeking clarification/opinion

Financial stringency is not a ground to deprive the daily wagers of their right for regularization: The Supreme Court of India
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

This Court approved the proposed scheme of the State of Gujarat and directed regularization of all those daily wagers who were eligible in accordan

Ocular evidence is considered the best evidence unless there are reasons to doubt it: The Supreme Court of India
July 27, 2021by Primelegal Team0

It is only in a case where there is a gross contradiction between medical evidence and oral evidence, and the medical evidence makes the ocular tes

Compassionate appointment is not a matter of right: Chhattisgarh High Court
July 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

When the earning member of the family dies, the compassionate appointment is not a matter of right but is up to the discretion of the establishment