Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Petitioner released on bail after being arrested under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354B/34IPC: High court of Patna
July 31, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner was arrested on the 11th of June 2020 under Section 341 IPC, “Punishment for wrongful restraint.” section 323, “Punishment for

FIR Quashed when the parties amicably settled the dispute: High Court of Uttarakhand.
July 31, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Where there is a genuine compromise and there is hardly any likelihood of the offender being convicted, then FIR should be quashed. A single Judge

Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual: High Court of Uttarakhand.
July 31, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception. The object of keeping the accused person in detention during the trial is not punishment, b

Appeal for Sentence modification granted to the Appellant: High court Of Bombay
Appeal for Sentence modification granted to the Appellant: High court Of Bombay
July 31, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In the present case, an appeal is arising out of the judgment and order dated 21.02.2018 where the appellant has been convicted for the offense pun

Convict released on parole even when he was not able to pay the surety amount: High Court of Bombay
July 31, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Parole refers to when an individual serving a term of imprisonment gets released into the community, but remains under the supervision of a parole

“It is open for the appellant to file a fresh appeal as per law, if he is not satisfied with the reply provided by the respondent…”: Appellate Authority, SEBI.
July 31, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Amarjeet Singh adj

“Response to the query would be an answer either affirmative or negative, depending on the available records…”: Appellate Authority, SEBI, Part 3.
July 31, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Further, in the matter of Shri Shantaram Walavalkar vs. CPIO, SEBI (Decision dated January 17, 2013), it was noted that the Hon’ble CIC held: “

“Response to the query would be an answer either affirmative or negative, depending on the available records…”: Appellate Authority, SEBI, Part 2.
July 30, 2021by Primelegal Team0

5. Have you seen the Sl. No. 19(1197217) dt. 10.7.2019 of the letter as mentioned in the Ref above? 6. Today is 626 days, have you sent any informa

“Response to the query would be an answer either affirmative or negative, depending on the available records…”: Appellate Authority, SEBI, Part 1.
July 30, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Amarjeet Singh adj

The court may grant an extension to a party for compliance with an order before issuing a contempt of court notice: High Court of Uttarakhand
July 30, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Judging by the facts of a case, the court may be inclined towards granting an extension to party enabling them to comply with the order if they had