Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“Under S.19(1) of the RTI Act an aggrieved person may prefer the first appeal within thirty days from the receipt of the response from the CPIO of the concerned public authority.”: SEBI, Part 3.
August 6, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In this context, reference is made to the matter of Shri S.P. Goyal vs. Shri Pragati Kumar & Ors. (order dated January 24, 2008), wherein the H

Issues that affect the livelihood of workers cannot be left pending for long periods of time: Delhi High Court
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

When the livelihood of a daily wage worker is in question in a particular petition, it must be dealt with utmost importance and urgency. Delaying s

Complaint barred by limitation is an abuse to the process of law: Supreme Court of India
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Any complaint that is ex facie barred by limitation and allowing proceedings to move forward on the basis of such a complaint amounts to an abuse i

Government Resolution imposing ban on fresh recruitment will not apply to the appointments made on compassionate basis: Bombay High Court
Government Resolution imposing ban on fresh recruitment will not apply to the appointments made on compassionate basis: Bombay High Court
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Government Resolution imposing ban on fresh recruitment will not apply to the appointments made on compassionate basis, simply because, the very ob

Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C require great caution in its exercise: High Court of Uttarakhand.
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C can be exercised- to give effect to an order under the Code, to prevent abuse of the process of court, and

Accused alleged under Sections 328, 341/34 of I.P.C. and Sections 7/8 and 16/11 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, bail granted: High Court of Uttarakhand.
Accused alleged under Sections 328, 341/34 of I.P.C. and Sections 7/8 and 16/11 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, bail granted: High Court of Uttarakhand.
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

When there is no reason to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, then the accused should be released on bail. A single Judge

Petitioners were released on bail after being arrested under Sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 379, 504, 506, 386, 307 IPC and 27 of the Arms Act, 1957: High court of Patna
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioners were apprehended under Section 147 IPC, “Punishment for rioting”, section 341, “Punishment for wrongful restraint” section

No criminal proceedings against accused when the settlement has been done between the parties: High Court of Kerala
No criminal proceedings against accused when the settlement has been done between the parties: High Court of Kerala
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The process of the court will get abused by the continuance of criminal proceedings in a matter where the settlement has been done. A single bench

The FIR can be quashed in cases where there exists no chance of conviction of the accused person: The High Court of Jharkhand
The FIR can be quashed in cases where there exists no chance of conviction of the accused person: The High Court of Jharkhand
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In a criminal case where the victim and the accused person have arrived at a compromise and there are no other witnesses to the alleged crime, ther

No error in the impugned judgment of conviction for offence punishable under Section 25 Arms Act on grounds of improper procedure: Delhi High Court
August 5, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Possession for arms without permit is illegal, but this illegality requires to proven by following the appropriate procedures and the mandated code