Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
In a trademark infringement suit, the Delhi High Court awarded Sun Pharma a five-lakh-rupee penalty for its 2001 “Oxiplat” trademark.
In a trademark infringement suit, the Delhi High Court awarded Sun Pharma a five-lakh-rupee penalty for its 2001 “Oxiplat” trademark.
August 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Sun Parma Laboratories Ltd. v. Mylan Laboratories Limited & Anr. Decided on:  2nd August, 2023 +  CS(COMM) 1098/2016 & I.A.1395/

CONTINUE READING
Courts Cannot Determine Whether Agreement Is A Works Contract Under MSMED Act; Only Arbitration Can Be Used- Delhi High Court
Courts Cannot Determine Whether Agreement Is A Works Contract Under MSMED Act; Only Arbitration Can Be Used- Delhi High Court
August 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council & Anr. Decided on:  2nd August, 2023 +  LPA 565/2023

CONTINUE READING
Alternate remedy not a bar to approach HC: Bombay HC
Alternate remedy not a bar to approach HC: Bombay HC
August 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: NAMDEO APPARAO CHATE AND ORS. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS. Decided on: 26th July, 2023 + WRIT PETITION NO. 659

CONTINUE READING
Bombay High Court: The Right to seek enhanced compensation does not go away merely because the petitioner has signed an affidavit accepting that he will not claim enhanced compensation
Bombay High Court: The Right to seek enhanced compensation does not go away merely because the petitioner has signed an affidavit accepting that he will not claim enhanced compensation
August 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Devidas S/o Kawdu Channe and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Decided on: 8th AUGUST, 2023. WRIT PETITION NO. 4977 OF 2023 CORAM: ANI

CONTINUE READING
Commercial Electricity Rates Inapplicable To Lawyers’ Chambers As Legal Profession Is Not ‘Commercial’ In Nature: Allahabad High Court
Commercial Electricity Rates Inapplicable To Lawyers’ Chambers As Legal Profession Is Not ‘Commercial’ In Nature: Allahabad High Court
August 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

CASE TITLE:   Tehsil Bar Association, Sadar Tehsil Parisar, Gandhi Nagar, Ghaziabad vs. U.P. Power Corporation Limited And 3 Others 2023 LiveLaw

CONTINUE READING
Students Should Be Given Opportunity To Reform, Instead Of Punitive Punishment: Allahabad High Court
Students Should Be Given Opportunity To Reform, Instead Of Punitive Punishment: Allahabad High Court
August 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

CASE TITLE:   Prakhar Nagar vs. State of UP & 4 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 244 [Writ C No. 21339/2020] DECIDED ON: 02.08.2023 CORAM: Hon’

CONTINUE READING
The Centre agrees in the Karnataka High Court to review a request to investigate the ‘Havana Syndrome’ phenomenon within India.
The Centre agrees in the Karnataka High Court to review a request to investigate the ‘Havana Syndrome’ phenomenon within India.
August 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: A Amarnath Chagu And Union of India Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 22221 OF 2021 Date of Order: 27-07-2023 CORAM: HON’BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA S DI

CONTINUE READING
75 year old accused under Sections 468, 469, 471, 194, 211, and 120B of the IPC granted bail due to evidence being entirely documentary and old age – Gujarat high court
75 year old accused under Sections 468, 469, 471, 194, 211, and 120B of the IPC granted bail due to evidence being entirely documentary and old age – Gujarat high court
August 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: Raman Sreekumar v State of Gujarat Decided On-: 04/08/2023 21621 of 2022 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Ilesh vora INTRODUCTION- The applicant

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka High Court rules against arbitrary fixation of seized vehicle’s security under Karnataka Motor Vehicle Rules
Karnataka High Court rules against arbitrary fixation of seized vehicle’s security under Karnataka Motor Vehicle Rules
August 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Mustafa s/o Maktumsab Rasoolanavar And The State of Karnataka Case No: Criminal Revision Petition No. 100268 of 2023 (397-) Date of Order: 1

CONTINUE READING
Counsel pleads it is mandatory upon the Investigating Officer to obtain opinion of the Registrar for infringement of Trade Mark about infringement of the trademark . FIR quashed –Gujarat High court
Counsel pleads it is mandatory upon the Investigating Officer to obtain opinion of the Registrar for infringement of Trade Mark about infringement of the trademark . FIR quashed –Gujarat High court
August 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: Mihir surendrabhai shah v State of Gujarat Decided On-: 31/07/2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Ilesh Vora INTRODUCTION- FIR under section 1

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.