Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
If the petitioner cannot demonstrate “illegal detention/confinement,” the habeas corpus petition will not be accepted. Gujarat High court
If the petitioner cannot demonstrate “illegal detention/confinement,” the habeas corpus petition will not be accepted. Gujarat High court
August 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Lilabhai shankarbhai sapriya v State of Gujarat Decided On-: 01/08/2023 7864 of 2020 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Umesh A. Trivedi  and M

CONTINUE READING
No pertinent or convincing evidence, the authority cannot take legal action for the breach of maintaining public order under section 3 (1) of the Act. : Gujarat high court
No pertinent or convincing evidence, the authority cannot take legal action for the breach of maintaining public order under section 3 (1) of the Act. : Gujarat high court
August 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Dipakbhai Madhavbhai Baraiya v State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 11, 2023 12592 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia and Mr

CONTINUE READING
Bombay HC: Disqualification under Section 14 (1) (j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act is invalid if it is based merely on some encroachment claim
Bombay HC: Disqualification under Section 14 (1) (j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act is invalid if it is based merely on some encroachment claim
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Sunita w/o Ramkrushna Pandalwad v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Decided on: 09.08.2023 + WRIT PETITION NO. 8956 OF 2023 CORAM: KISHORE C.

CONTINUE READING
Bombay High Court: No claim for reservation can be made simultaneously in two different categories
Bombay High Court: No claim for reservation can be made simultaneously in two different categories
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Pradeep Bapurao Mohite Patil v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Decided on: 18.08.2023 WRIT PETITION NO. 1736 OF

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka High Court Establishes Parties’ Legal Rights Upon Filing Lawsuit, Subsequent Developments Do Not Impact Jurisdiction
Karnataka High Court Establishes Parties’ Legal Rights Upon Filing Lawsuit, Subsequent Developments Do Not Impact Jurisdiction
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Krishnaprasad A AND L Doreswamy Case No: HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO.10/2022 Date of Order: 11-08-2023 INTRODUCTION The Karnataka High

CONTINUE READING
During the Preliminary Decree phase, a buyer who owns an undivided interest does not possess the authority to influence a partition lawsuit, as stated by the Karnataka High Court
During the Preliminary Decree phase, a buyer who owns an undivided interest does not possess the authority to influence a partition lawsuit, as stated by the Karnataka High Court
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Vinayak Metrani And Gadigevva @ Neelavva & Others Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 106032 OF 2022 CORAM: HON’BLE JUSTICE SACHIN SHA

CONTINUE READING
The Madras High Court held that the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act stood compounded under Section 147 of the same Act.  
The Madras High Court held that the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act stood compounded under Section 147 of the same Act.  
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Dated : 17.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.R.C(MD)No.279 of 2022   Introduction: The case of S. Madan v. T. Dhanam re

CONTINUE READING
The Madras High Court in a case about a Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution concluded that the subjective satisfaction reached by the Authority regarding the detenu’s potential bail was impaired.
The Madras High Court in a case about a Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution concluded that the subjective satisfaction reached by the Authority regarding the detenu’s potential bail was impaired.
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  DATED : 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL   Introduction: The case of Reeta Mary v

CONTINUE READING
The Madras High Court releases accused on bail upon executing a bond of Rs. 25,000 along with specific conditions in a case filed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
The Madras High Court releases accused on bail upon executing a bond of Rs. 25,000 along with specific conditions in a case filed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.A.(MD).No.658 of 2023 Introduction: The case of State of Tamil Nadu v. Dha

CONTINUE READING
The Madras High court applied Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and compounded the offense under Section 138 in judgement regarding a dishonoured cheque
The Madras High court applied Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and compounded the offense under Section 138 in judgement regarding a dishonoured cheque
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Rajesh v. Sathish Kumar Dated : 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.R.C.(MD).No.904 of 2023 Introduction: The case of

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.