Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Bombay High Court declares compensation to the claimants of an “untoward incident” on the Railways
Bombay High Court declares compensation to the claimants of an “untoward incident” on the Railways
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Ramesh Laxmanrao Dighade & Ors. v. UoI Decided on: 25/07/2023 + FIRST APPEAL N O . 1422 OF 2019 CORAM: SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J Facts of th

Bombay High Court dismisses a petition under Sec. 127, MRTP Act for unreasonable delay
Bombay High Court dismisses a petition under Sec. 127, MRTP Act for unreasonable delay
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Shri. Parag Prakash Mutha v. Kashinath Barku Bhalsingh & Ors Decided on: 18.08.2023 WRIT PETITION NO. 662 OF 2023 CORAM: CORAM: SANDEEP

‘Severe Neglect of Public Welfare’: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Payment of 1 Lakh Penalty for Petition Contesting NHAI’s Land Acquisition
‘Severe Neglect of Public Welfare’: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Payment of 1 Lakh Penalty for Petition Contesting NHAI’s Land Acquisition
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Gurdarshan Singh Gill Vs.  Union of India 2023:PHHC:105728-DB Coram HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana Annuls FIR Against Former Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Badal for Alleged Breach of Restrictive Orders Amidst the COVID Pandemic.
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana Annuls FIR Against Former Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Badal for Alleged Breach of Restrictive Orders Amidst the COVID Pandemic.
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Sukhbir Singh Badal Vs. State of Punjab Date of decision: 24.08.2023 CRM-M-1672-2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA FACT: On June

Delhi High Court Affirms Maternity Benefits for DSLSA Empanelled Advocates
Delhi High Court Affirms Maternity Benefits for DSLSA Empanelled Advocates
August 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Annwesha Deb v. Delhi State Legal Services Authority Decided on:  26th July, 2023 +  W.P.(C) 11016/2017 & CM APPL. 2071/2022 CORAM:

DRT is a quasi-judicial forum, this Gujarat high Court refrains from making any additional observations
DRT is a quasi-judicial forum, this Gujarat high Court refrains from making any additional observations
August 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  TITLE:  Biren Chandrakant Shah through LHS Dimple Biren Shah Versus Authorised Officer, Punjab National Bank Decided On-: August 17, 2023 1

Human beings are supreme, and their freedom cannot be limited unless their detention is absolutely necessary and their actions have an impact on “public order.” : Gujarat high court
Human beings are supreme, and their freedom cannot be limited unless their detention is absolutely necessary and their actions have an impact on “public order.” : Gujarat high court
August 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Asalam through Arshad Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 17, 2023 . 12790 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S .Supehia and M

The Madras High Court considers the fact that the parties have chosen to settle their differences amicably, and acknowledges that the offences involved in the case are not compoundable in nature   
The Madras High Court considers the fact that the parties have chosen to settle their differences amicably, and acknowledges that the offences involved in the case are not compoundable in nature  
August 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  DATED : 23.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P No.19231 of 2023     Factual Background: The case of Sarath Ku

The Madras High Court acknowledged that the assault was not premeditated and modified the conviction from Section 302 (murder) to Section 304 Part I (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)
The Madras High Court acknowledged that the assault was not premeditated and modified the conviction from Section 302 (murder) to Section 304 Part I (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)
August 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

    Dated: 23/ 08 / 2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA Crl.A.No.66 of 2022 Factual Background: The case of Murugesan vs. State

Karnataka High Court Declines Request for In-Person Testimony of Judge Witness in Criminal Case, Stating Virtual Cross Examination Unbiased to Accused
Karnataka High Court Declines Request for In-Person Testimony of Judge Witness in Criminal Case, Stating Virtual Cross Examination Unbiased to Accused
August 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Mahadev And State of Karnataka Case No: Criminal Petition No 200953/2023 Date of Order: 11-08-2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Venkate