Bombay HC: Occupant rather than an owner of the insured car entitled to compensation
Bombay HC: Occupant rather than an owner of the insured car entitled to compensation Title: Bharti W/o Sunil Dhat and Ors. v. Navnath Dagdu Dhat an
Justice Served: Bombay High Court Upholds Detention Order Under MPDA Act
Title: Mohsin Anwar Khan @ Shaikh v. Commissioner of Police, Pune & Ors. Decided on: 30th AUGUST, 2023 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION(STAMP) NO. 7365 O
Simple disruption of law and order that results in disorder is not always enough to justify action under the Act : Gujarat High Court
TITLE: Rupabhai Ghelabhai Gamara Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 13369 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia &
The preservation of law and order undoubtedly helps to prevent disorder, but disorder is a broad category that can include anything from minor annoyances to catastrophic events.: Gujarat High Court
TITLE: Vishnudatt Shukla Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 12622 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia & Mr. M.
It is obvious that not every assault or injury to a specific individual results in public disorder. :Gujarat High Court
TITLE: Virendrasinh Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 13347 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia & Mr. M.R Men
The standard of negatively affecting the “maintenance of public order” cannot be met by merely suspecting a violation of law and order. Gujarat High Court
TITLE: Dharmesh Versus State of Gujarat Decided On-: August 19, 2023 12965 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia & Mr. M.R
An argument with the judicial officer is not a ground for transfer of the case: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Raj Bala Vs. Rishabh Birla 2023:PHHC:110117 Coram HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL DATE: 23.08.2023 FACTS: The information derived from th
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana lists the factors relating to grant of probation
Nasri Vs. State of Haryana Date of decision: 17.07.2023 CRM-A-38-MA-2017 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARJUN MONGA FACT: On June 27, 2012, aroun
Karnataka High Court Reduces Sentence of 70-Year-Old Inmate on Death Row After 30 Years of Incarceration, Raises Concerns Over Unjustified Delay in Resolving Mercy Plea
Case Title: Saibanna s/o Ningappa Natikar AND The Union of India & Others Case No: Writ Petition no. 3297 of 2013 Date of Order: 17-08-2023 COR
Karnataka High Court Rules Railway Claims Tribunal Lacks Authority to Penalize Individuals for Failure to Honor Its Award
Case Title: The Union of India v. Malini & Others Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 12947 OF 2017 Date of Order: 31-07-2023 INTRODUCTION The Karnataka
