Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Bombay High Court at Goa upholds a writ petition after its maintainability was challenged by an order from the trial court owing to delay in filing of written statement.
The Bombay High Court at Goa upholds a writ petition after its maintainability was challenged by an order from the trial court owing to delay in filing of written statement.
September 4, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court at Goa upholds a writ petition after its maintainability was challenged by an order from the trial court owing to delay in fi

The compounding of an offence punishable under Section 408 of the IPC only up to the amount of Rs. 2000 is not addressed in any way by Section 320 of the Cr. P.C. : Gujarat High Court
The compounding of an offence punishable under Section 408 of the IPC only up to the amount of Rs. 2000 is not addressed in any way by Section 320 of the Cr. P.C. : Gujarat High Court
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Kamlesh Ramchandra Wadhwani Versus State of Gujarat and Others Decided On-: August 25, 2023 340 of 2013 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr

It is possible to visualize the inconvenience mentioned in the petition filed under section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and give it some weight. : Gujarat High Court
It is possible to visualize the inconvenience mentioned in the petition filed under section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and give it some weight. : Gujarat High Court
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Madhuri Versus Lalit Shankarlal Gangvani Decided On-: August 22, 2023 304 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. J.C Doshi INTRODUCTI

Counsel on behalf of the accused charged under section 25(1) of The arms act argues on the false implication on recovery of weapon: Gujarat High Court
Counsel on behalf of the accused charged under section 25(1) of The arms act argues on the false implication on recovery of weapon: Gujarat High Court
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Pappu Versus  State of Gujarat and Others Decided On-: August 22, 2023 4695 of 2014 INTRODUCTION-   The original accused has aske

No Disapproval NOC for Meat Shop on the Ground of Unauthorised Sale of Meet : Allahabad High Court
No Disapproval NOC for Meat Shop on the Ground of Unauthorised Sale of Meet : Allahabad High Court
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Mohd. Shakeel vs. State Of U.P Decided on : 29th, August ,2023   WRIT-C NO. – 5534 of  2023   CORAM – HON”BLE JUSTICE V

The prosecution has utterly failed to prove this chain of events against the accused Gujarat High Court upholds the trial court conviction
The prosecution has utterly failed to prove this chain of events against the accused Gujarat High Court upholds the trial court conviction
September 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE  – Nareshkumar Mangaji Khant Versus State of Gujarat   Decided On-: August 25, 2023 14 of 2016  CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. M.R Me

Counsel on behalf of the accused charged under section 25(1) of The arms act argues on the false implication on recovery of weapon: Gujarat High Court
Counsel on behalf of the accused charged under section 25(1) of The arms act argues on the false implication on recovery of weapon: Gujarat High Court
September 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title – Pappu Versus  State of Gujarat and Others Decided On-: August 22, 2023 4695 of 2014 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. M.R Mengdey INTRODU

The severity of the crime and the alleged punishment will be considered before granting bail.: Gujarat High Court
The severity of the crime and the alleged punishment will be considered before granting bail.: Gujarat High Court
September 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE:  Rahul Ajaykumar Singhal Versus AY Baloch Inspector of Police Decided On-: August 22, 2023 1202 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Su

Delhi High Court Clarifies Whether Summary Suit is Maintainable for Recovery Claims Based on Invoices and Ledger Accounts
Delhi High Court Clarifies Whether Summary Suit is Maintainable for Recovery Claims Based on Invoices and Ledger Accounts
September 1, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Modern Construction Company Delhi v. Hitech Enterprises  RFA(COMM) 76/2023 & CM APPL. 20581/2023   Date of Decision: 24th August

The Madras High Court’s decision essentially provided the petitioner with an opportunity to have their case reviewed and the loan amount recalculated in compliance with the government directives.
The Madras High Court’s decision essentially provided the petitioner with an opportunity to have their case reviewed and the loan amount recalculated in compliance with the government directives.
September 1, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  DATED: 31.08.2023 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.21308 of 2023   Introduction: The case centers around a writ petition