Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Testimony of the prosecutrix should be of sterling character and not belied by medical and scientific evidences for it to lead to conviction: High Court of Sikkim
April 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Sole Testimony of the rape victim is enough for holding the accused liable for rape, however, the prosecutrix have to prove evidence beyond reasona

Police records and FIR are not substantive piece of evidence: High Court of Karnataka
April 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The records maintained by the Police during the course of their investigation cannot really be considered as substantive evidence and cannot be tak

Sympathy towards accused cannot be grounds for lesser punishment: Gauhati High Court
Sympathy towards accused cannot be grounds for lesser punishment: Gauhati High Court
April 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Given the seriousness of the crime committed by the appellant and all of the facts and circumstances of the case, we see no reason to be generous t

Rule 159(5) of the MGST Rules would be no bar to the petitioner from seeking relief under writ jurisdiction: Bombay High Court
Rule 159(5) of the MGST Rules would be no bar to the petitioner from seeking relief under writ jurisdiction: Bombay High Court
April 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Since the disputed bank account connection was found to be beyond jurisdiction, the petitioner’s ownership of an alternate remedy in the form

‘Compromise Deed’- No Need to Extent trial as there are bleak chances of conviction to secure the ends of justice: High Court of Shimla
April 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

When compromise deed is signed then, even if, the trial is allowed to be continued, there are bleak chances of conviction to secure the ends of jus

No iota of Substance as to Construe Intention of Accused to kill the Injured: High Court of Shimla
No iota of Substance as to Construe Intention of Accused to kill the Injured: High Court of Shimla
April 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Even if statement of complainant is taken to be true as it is then also, there is no iota of substance in the said statement so as to construe inte

FIR quashed on the basis of suspicion: Bombay High Court
FIR quashed on the basis of suspicion: Bombay High Court
April 1, 2021by Primelegal Team0

A fair reading of the FIR will demonstrate that, as far as the plaintiff is concerned, the charges are ambiguous, non-specific, and fail to reveal

For commercial functions importance has to be given to the lawfulness of the function and not to its soundness: Gauhati High Court
April 1, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Constitutional Courts will judicially review matters of overwhelming Public Interest only when the administration is mala fide or the decision is a

No Relief of Further Enquiry Due to Lack of Evidence: Bombay High Court
April 1, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The allegation made in the writ petition is vague and ambiguous as to the lapses in the investigation. If the petitioner had pointed out something

Government can review their decision regarding promotion and transfer, backed up by reason and facts: Gauhati High Court
April 1, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The transfer of any public officer or employee is decided upon by the authorities, and can only be challenged on grounds of Public Interest or due