Some irregularities in procedure to seize, shall not vitiate the seizure: High Court of Delhi
Even if there was an irregularity at the time of making a seizure, procedural or otherwise, it would not ipso facto vitiate the seizure. The Courts
Court cannot be a silent spectator when any party manifestly under estimates the valuation on estimation of relief: Bombay High Court
The value as determinable for computation of court fee and value for the purposes of jurisdiction shall be the same. No party to the litigation is
Local Police must not interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners while acting upon the complaint of the respondent: Allahabad High Court
In the interests of equity, good conscience and justice followed by a reading of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, the privacy of a married co
Privacy cannot be sacrificed in the name of ‘protection’- WhatsApp Dispute
Right to Privacy is guaranteed under Article 21 by the Constitution of India which is regarded as the supreme Law of the Land. Right to “informat
Resolution Professional do not have Locus standi to file appeal against claim allowed by Adjudicating Authority: NCLAT
RP is not vested with any adjudicatory powers. A decision taken by AA in regard to admission or rejection of a claim cannot be examined by RP. The
IBC can not intended to be a substitute for recovery forum : NCLAT
Wherever there is the existence of a real dispute, the IBC provisions cannot be invoked. The Object of the Code is not recovery of money but to bri
Payment of rent by member of Joint Hindu Family, raises no presumption that it is a Joint Family Business: Supreme Court
While addressing a dispute regarding the induction of tenant by the Wakf Board, the Supreme Court held that payment of rent by grandfather or great
Consent immaterial under POCSO Act when complainant is a minor: Himachal Pradesh High Court
While hearing a bail application for offences under the Indian Penal code and the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act), the
It is not necessary for the appellant to adduce any direct or positive evidence to establish his defense: Gauhati High Court
It is not necessary for the accused person to prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt or in default to incur a verdict of guilty. The onus of proo
The testimony of eye witness would be preferable to medical evidence, unless the medical evidence completely rules out the eye witness version: Gauhati High Court
The medical evidence value is usually only substantial. It shows that the injuries were allegedly caused and nothing more. The use of medical evide
