Karnataka High Court Grants Conditional Bail in NDPS Act Case: Cited Insignificant Quantity of Ganja Seizure
Case Title – Abdul Bashir Vs. State of Karnataka Case Number – CRL.P. No. 4147/2024 Dated on – 16th May, 2024 Quorum – Justice H.P. Sandesh
Cyber Harassment and Extortion: The Karnataka High Court Grants Bail with Conditions in Instagram Blackmail Allegation
Case Title – Akshay @Arjun Vs. State of Karnataka Case Number – CRL. P. No. 4163/2024 Dated on – 16th May, 2024 Quorum – Justice H. P. Sand
High Court Of Punjab And Haryana Mandates Eight-Week Review Period For Vehicle Permit Disputes
Case Title: Harbir and others Vs. State of Haryana and others Case No.: CWP-4523-2024 Dated on: February 27, 2024 Coram: VIKAS BAHL, J. Facts: In
High Court Of Andhra Pradesh’s Review On Extending Retirement Age for Bank Employees
Case title: Sri Puvvada Venkata Mohana Murali Krishna Murthy & Ors. Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. Case No.: W.P. No.4861 of 2018 C
Andhra Pradesh High Court’s in-depth investigation of writ petitions challenging the relocation of polling stations.
Case title: Dr. Chadalavada Aravinda Babu and Ors. VS. The Election Commission of India, and Ors. Case no: WRIT PETITION No. 26889 of 2023 ALONG WI
Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Government’s Decision in Determining Retirement Age for Cooperative Central Bank Employees
Case title: Sri Puvvada Venkata Mohana Murali Krishna Murthy and Ors. VS. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. Case no: W.P. No.4861 of 2018 Order
“Timely Transplant: Upholding Efficiency and Clarity in Organ Donation Processes”
Case Title: Amar Singh Bhatia & Anr. Versus Sir Ganga Ram Hospital & Ors., Case No: W.P.(C) 3590/2020 Decided on: 20th May , 2024 Quorum: T
Decision taken by the Bank cannot be said to be arbitrary or perverse or unreasonable as to become unsustainable: High Court Of Andra Pradesh
CASE TITTLE: Sri Puvvada Venkata Mohana Murali Krishna Murthy V The State of Andhra Pradesh, CASE NO: W.P. No.4861 of 2018 DATED ON: .05.2024 QUO
Intriguing insights from a landmark court decision on interpreting limitation and acknowledgment.
Case Title: M/S VOIR INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Versus M/S POLYBLENDS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Case No: C.R.P.
Delhi High Court: Extra judicial confessions are weak pieces of evidence, it is incumbent on the Courts to exercise extra caution while examining the same
CASE TITTLE: ROSHAN versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) CASE NO: BAIL APPLN. 2478/2023 ORDER ON: 20th May, 2024 QUORUM: JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJA
