Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Under section 482 CrPC, reliability or genuineness of allegations made in FIR/Complaint cannot be scrutinized: Supreme Court of India
Under section 482 CrPC, reliability or genuineness of allegations made in FIR/Complaint cannot be scrutinized: Supreme Court of India
December 12, 2021by Primelegal Team

While exercising its jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC, a High court cannot embark upon any enquiry regarding the reliability and genuineness of

During a vehicle search section, 50 NDPS Act is not necessary to be complied with: Supreme Court of India
During a vehicle search section, 50 NDPS Act is not necessary to be complied with: Supreme Court of India
December 12, 2021by Primelegal Team

The provisions laid down under section 50 NDPS Act are only required to be mandatorily followed in case of searching a person, On an occasion of a

In any case any objection same in nature cannot be raised or heard twice and adjudicated again:  High Court of Delhi.
In any case any objection same in nature cannot be raised or heard twice and adjudicated again:  High Court of Delhi.
December 12, 2021by Primelegal Team

In any case any objection same in nature cannot be raised or heard twice and adjudicated again:  High Court of Delhi. Any same objection of a case

Any mere irregularity cannot be the reason of quashing of the any Judgement: High court of Delhi.
December 12, 2021by Primelegal Team

Any mere irregularity cannot be the reason of quashing of the any Judgement: High court of Delhi. Section 392 of the IPC deals with punishment for

No Bail in case of Serious and Heinous Offences: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu
No Bail in case of Serious and Heinous Offences: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu
December 12, 2021by Primelegal Team

Where there is a charge for a heinous and serious offence, there is no reason for the Court to grant bail, as observed by the High Court of Jammu &

Validity of caste certificate considered afresh in favour of the appellant: Supreme Court of India.
December 11, 2021by Primelegal Team

Setting aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court Hon’ble M. R. Shah, J in the case of Rushikesh Bharat Garud vs. The State

Captive users are not liable to pay the additional surcharge levied under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003: Supreme Court of India
December 11, 2021by Primelegal Team

So far as the captive consumers / captive users are concerned, they are not liable to pay the additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Act,

Land Acquisition Act,1894- Guesswork involved in fixation of market value is to be made by adopting well-recognized methods: Supreme Court of India.
Land Acquisition Act,1894- Guesswork involved in fixation of market value is to be made by adopting well-recognized methods: Supreme Court of India.
December 11, 2021by Primelegal Team

It is well settled that fixation of market value in a Reference under Section 18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 necessarily involves some gues

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is not intended for Recovery, Existence of a Real Dispute excludes its Invocation: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is not intended for Recovery, Existence of a Real Dispute excludes its Invocation: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
December 11, 2021by Primelegal Team

The necessity to limit the application of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and prevent the use of the statute as a means of recovery of su

If evidence of eye-witness is contrary to the FIR, no weightage can be given to the FIR: Supreme Court of India
December 11, 2021by Primelegal Team

It is noted that PW-1 was traveling in the same car and PW–3, who has given a statement before the police, was examined as eye–witness. In view