Reevaluating Article 356 of the Indian Constitution: A Critical Perspective on Presidential Rule
Reevaluating Article 356 of the Indian Constitution: A Critical Perspective on Presidential Rule ABSTRACT Parliamentary approval is necessary for
Navigating Competition: Unraveling Pricing Dynamics in India’s Legal Landscape
ABSTRACT: The introduction of new technologies promises a number of advantages from the perspective of competition, including more competition, c
“Justice Served: Delving into the High Court’s Dismissal of the Habeas Corpus Petition in a Family Dispute”- Delhi HC
Case Title: INDRAKALI VERMA Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Case No: W.P.(CRL) 1611/2024 Decided on: 20th May , 2024 Quorum: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUR
The High Court of Karnataka, while granting bail ruled that,the allegations against the petitioner are not sufficient to resist bail
CASE TITTLE: MADHUNIRANJAN SWAMY M. S. V STATE OF KARNATAKA CASE NO: CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4300 OF 2024 DATED ON: 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2024 QUORUM: JUS
Karnataka High Court, orders granting of bail with the intension to re-establish their matrimonial life.
CASE TITTLE: HANISH ABDUL KHADAR V STATE OF KARNATAKA, SHILPA CASE NO: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 582 OF 2024 (U/S 14(A) (2) DATED ON: 21ST DAY OF MAY, 20
Karnataka HC: Gravity of Offence Considered, Bail Granted to Accused in Mangalore Robbery Case
Case Title: LAKSHMAN Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No.: CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3537 OF 2024 Dated on: 16th MAY, 2024 Coram: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H.
K’taka High Court Upholds Election Commission’s Decision to deny Free Public Transportation for 2024 MLC Elections.
CASE TITLE – SAYED KHALIL ULLA HUSSAINI v. THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA CASE NUMBER – WP NO. 12711 OF 2024 DATED ON – 16.05.2024 QU
Karnataka HC grants Bail to Udaya Kumar Shetty, a bank supervisor, accused of harassing a woman, leading to her suicide.
Case Title: UDAYA KUMAR SHETTY Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No.: CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3835 OF 2024 Dated on: 16th MAY, 2024 Coram: THE HON’BLE
K’taka High Court grants relief to Accused after nearly 3 years due to Failure of Witness testimony to provide Incriminating Evidence.
CASE TITLE – Salman Chirik v. State of Karnataka CASE NUMBER – CP NO.3782 OF 2024 DATED ON – 14.05.2023 QUORUM – Justice H.P. Sandesh FA
Order 24 of Board of Revenue Standing Orders, Revenue Department, could never be invoked for resumption of land on account of non-utilization of the portion of the land in question: High Court of Andra Pradesh.
CASE TITTLE: M/s. Sweekaar Rehabilitation Institute for Handicapped, Secunderabad v The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department CASE NO: WRIT A
