Under Section 482 Cr.P.C., FIR can be quashed in terms of the settlement: Allahabad High Court
Section 482 of CrPC for Quashing of FIR: The Hon’ble Supreme Court after discussing various precedents on the subject summarized the followin
Why should a newborn child suffer from the hyper technicalities of law? : Allahabad High Court
Section ¾ of POCSO Act: The Information Technology Act 2000. Chapter II and Chapter III of the POCSO Act focus on the definitions and punishment f
Kerala University of Health Sciences held responsible for denying maternity benefits to employees: High Court of Kerala
The High Court of Kerala, through learned judge, Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V held Kerala University of Health Sciences held responsible for denyi
Corporation’s response sought for non-payment of salary to KSRTC Employees: Kerala High Court
The High Court of Kerala, through learned judge, Justice Justice Devan Ramachandran, sought Corporation’s Response for non-payment of salary
Time granted to Crime Branch till 15th July to complete investigation in actress assault case: Kerala High Court
The High Court of Kerala, through the learned judge, Justice Kauser Edappagath granted the Crime Branch time till 15th July to complete the investi
The failure to keep the promise on a future uncertain date does not always amount to misconception of fact under section 90 of IPC : Madhya Pradesh High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Gopal Oyan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh (M.Cr.C. No.37322 of 2021) upheld that the failure to keep
Conduct and modus operandi on the part of the appellant is fully admissible and is sufficient to hold the accused guilty of committing the offense under section 8 of Evidence Act : Madhya pradesh High Court
In the case of Amresh Singh vs State Of M.P. (CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1043 OF 2011) the Madhya pradesh High Court upheld that conduct and modus operand
In a case of circumstantial evidence a completed chain of events must be such as to rule out a reasonable likelihood of the innocence of the accused : Madhya Pradesh High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Sabir Khan vs State Of M.P. (CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.788 OF 2011) upheld that In a case of circumstantial e
A writ Petition was disposed off by the Patna High Court on the ground that the Petitioner was not passing requisite eligibility criteria.
This case was filled by Ravikiran Prabhakar Dhobale Son of Prabhakar Dhobale, Resident of E Ward Sadar Bazar Vichare Mal, District – Kolhapur
Disregard of section 143 and section 154 of the Income Tax Act is arbitrary and illegal: Patna High Court.
This case was a writ Petition filled by Lalit Narayan Mishra College of Business Management against the Principal Chief Commissioner,
