Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Calcutta high court dismissed a petition as the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality/irregularity on the part of the respondents in terminating the contract of the petitioner, after issuing warning to do so, worth interference by the writ court.
June 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Calcutta high court dismissed a petition as the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality/irregularity on the part of the respondents in te

  If a case is barred under the timelines contemplated under section 34(3) ofThe Arbitration Act, 1940 then the petitioner cannot be permitted to take recourse the benefit of section 14 of The Limitation Act: Calcutta High Court
June 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Judgment in the case of Suresh Kumar Agarwal vs L & T Finance Ltd (AP/214/2017) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHAR

These cases cannot assist the petitioners for injuncting IFIN from proceeding in terms of enforcing its right under the Pledge Agreements: Calcutta High.
June 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The judgement in the case of Aditya Khaitan And Ors vs Il And Fs Financial Services (AP/206/2020) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI

Court below has not correctly appreciated the evidence on record or that acquittal of the accused has resulted into travesty of justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court.
June 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Court below has not correctly appreciated the evidence on record or that acquittal of the accused has resulted into travesty of justice, upheld by

The High Court denied a plea from the school principal opposing his or her transfer.: Himachal Pradesh High Court
The High Court denied a plea from the school principal opposing his or her transfer.: Himachal Pradesh High Court
June 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh denied a plea from the school principal opposing his or her transfer., is upheld by the High Court of Himachal P

Order. 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to supplement testimony that has already been given: Himachal Pradesh High Court
June 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Order. 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to supplement testimony that has already been given, is upheld by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh through

PIL filed seeking to institutionalise effective machinery and mechanism for rescue and post rescue rehabilitation of all child labourers in the State of Rajasthan : Rajasthan High Court
June 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivatsava and Justice Sameer Jain in the case of Gopal Singh Bareth v

For Parole of seven days, court asked convict belonging to  BPL category to pay two Lakh personal bond and one lakh surety: Rajasthan High Court
For Parole of seven days, court asked convict belonging to BPL category to pay two Lakh personal bond and one lakh surety: Rajasthan High Court
June 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Rameshwar Vyas in the case of Raju @ Rajkumar Through His Bro

Murder conviction set aside on finding inconsistency between medical & ocular evidence : Rajasthan High Court
June 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani in the case of Fula @ Fulchand v. State

SUB-REGISTRAR WOULD BECOME FUNCTUS OFFICIO AFTER REGISTRATION OF THE SALE DEED: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
June 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Jaishree Thakur in the case of Sa