Court could not deny freedom to a person simply because he is impoverished is upheld by the Uttarakhand High Court in the case of Ajeet Pal v. Stat
Court could not deny freedom to a person simply because he is impoverished is upheld by the Uttarakhand High Court in the case of Ajeet Pal v. Stat
This particular decision is held by the High Court Of Karnataka through the single bench of Justice Mohammad Nawaz in the case of ZAKIR HUSSAIN v S
This particular decision is held by the High Court Of Karnataka through the division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice J M Kh
In the case of Surendra Kumar Sahoo v. State of Odisha (W.P.(C) No. 30107 of 2021), (W.P.(C) No. 31137 of 2021) & (W.P.(C) No. 41959 of 2021),
The Orissa High Court has ruled that before the Court may file charges against the accused, there must be “grave suspicion” and not onl
In the case of M/s. Cresent Co. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Sambalpur and other connected matters (ITA No. 221-223 of 2004), the Orissa High Cou
Respondents to start the process of filling the post of Assistant Clerk in the school by way of promotion from the qualified Group IV employees is
The engagement of the elder son will not obstruct the petitioner’s request for appointment on humanitarian grounds in any way is upheld by th
A PIL claiming that a Muslim girl getting married while still being a minor breaches her fundamental right to safety, education, and a dignified li
The Karnataka High Court on 7th July 2022 ruled that family courts must accept affidavits from aggrieved parties (wife and children) clearly sta