blog - Page 474 of 1004 - Prime Legal Law Firm

FOR DETERMINATION OF IMPLICATIONS IN LIMITATION PERIOD OF CUSTOMS ACT, APPLY DOCTRINE OF ‘SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION ‘ : MADRAS HIGH COURT.

The Madras Highcourt passed a judgment on 30-06-2022. In the case of Lalchand Bhimraj v. CESTAT, WP Nos. 34308 & 34309 of 2004. In a case where

IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON TEENAGERS, INDULGING IN SEXUAL OFFENCES : MADRAS HIGH COURT.

The Madras Highcourt passed a judgment on 28 April, 2022. In the case of Kanthan v State and others(Crl.O.P.No.9443 of 2022).The Madras High Court

A caste in SC list can only be included by parliament: Allahabad High Court

Allahabad High Court Quashes UP Govt Orders Notifying 17 OBCs as Scheduled Castes by stating that “A caste in SC list can only be included by par

State Government Prima Facie Liable To Pay Compensation To Kin Of Persons Who Die Due To Poisonous Liquor Consumption: Allahabad High Court

Allahabad High court said that Prima Facie state govt is liable to pay compensation to kin of persons who die due to poisonous liquor consumption i

Maharashtrian Government directed to pay compensation to Nigerian National : Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court directed the Maharashtra government to pay ₹2 lakh as compensation to a Nigerian national who was wrongly incarcerated in a

Modification of the Trial Court order, sentence of the accused to changed 7 years rigorous imprisonment: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court in the case of rape of a deaf and dumb married woman, the Bombay High Court has substituted the sentence awarded by the Trial

DIRECTION OF TEACHERS TO THEIR STUDENTS REGARDING STUDIES , SHOULDN’T LEAD TO AS ABETMENT OF SUICIDE: MADRAS HIGH COURT.

THE MADRAS HIGHCOURT PASSED A JUDGMENT ON 26.08.2022. In the case of Kiruthika Jayaraj v. State of Tamil Nadu ,(AIR 1976 SC 1519). In a case relate

COURT REDUCES THE SENTENCE TO LIFE TIME IMPRSIONMENT IN KATTAI RAJA CASE: MADRAS HIGH COURT.

THE MADRAS HIGHCOURT PASSED A JUDGMENT ON 30.08.2022. In the case of State of Tamil Nadu v Kattai (W.P.(MD)Nos.9701 to 9703 of) 20140.08.2022. case

Courts have to look over miscarriage of justice While Examining Witness on Commission Incapable of Attending Proceedings: Delhi High court

The Delhi High Court has observed that Court Must Prevent Miscarriage Of Justice While Examining Witness on Commission Incapable of Attending Proce

Writ Jurisdiction to be exercised only when the person or authority to whom the same is issued is within its territory: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court has observed that it can exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution only when the person or authority to whom

Blogs And Articles