Government cannot regulate the fees of private unaided schools: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High court has said under Justice ES Indiresh in Rashmi Education Trust Vidyaniketan School & Others v. State of Karnataka &
Death Sentence for committing rape and murder of 8-year-old girl, confirmed: Rajasthan High Court.
Death Sentence for committing rape and murder of 8-year-old girl, confirmed: Rajasthan High Court. The Rajasthan High Court passed a judgement on 0
Court orders that schools refund or adjust 15% of school fees paid during the COVID period (2020–21): Allahabad High Court
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) NO. – 576 OF 2020 ADARSH BHUSHAN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH BENCH: CHIEF JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL AND JUSTICE J. J.
Whether complainant’s revision against dismissal of his complaint, can be decided without giving an opportunity of hearing to the accused petitioner. Rajasthan High Court
Whether complainant’s revision against dismissal of his complaint, can be decided without giving an opportunity of hearing to the accused petitio
Court rejected Arvind Kejriwal’s request for a discharge in a criminal case for alleged hate speech against the BJP and Congress: Allahabad High Court
APPLICATION U/S 482 NO.42 OF 2023 ARVIND KEJRIWAL V. STATE OF U.P. BENCH: JUSTICE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN FACTS OF THE CASE Justice Rajesh Singh Ch
The appellants cannot be deprived of the interest accrued during the pendency of the appeal: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 15th of December, 2022 in which the court has increased the amount of compensatio
There are material contradictions in the statements of the police officials also.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 30th of December, 2022 in which the court upheld the judgement of the trial court
Contributing towards share capital is not mandatory for each partner in a firm: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High court said under Justice Umesh M Adiga in Venkataraya S Nayak v. D Vijaygopal Mallya(Regular Second Appeal No. 1035 of 2007) a p
It cannot be lost sight of the fact that the object of jail is not punitive but to secure the presence of the accused during the trial: Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN. 2779/2022 VIVEK PANDEY vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ANR. The current application was filed under Section 439 (Special powers of H
Deprivation of personal liberty, without an assurance of speedy trial is ante-thesis to the principle enshrined in our Constitution under Article 21: Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN. 672/2022 PARAMJIT SINGH GULATI vs DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE The current bail application was filed under Section 439 (Speci
