Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The High Court of Delhi laid back manufacturers from using the Nilkranti device mark in a suit by Nilkamal however holds no resemblance between the marks.
The High Court of Delhi laid back manufacturers from using the Nilkranti device mark in a suit by Nilkamal however holds no resemblance between the marks.
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title of the case: NILKAMAL CRATES AND CONTAINERS & ANR. CS(COMM) 707/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR Judgement dated: 06

Simply asserting EVM was imperfect would not prove to be a false election without proof of material impact on the outcome:Bombay High court
Simply asserting EVM was imperfect would not prove to be a false election without proof of material impact on the outcome:Bombay High court
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case no. – Writ Petition No. 280/2023  Case Title – Meerabai W/o Dnyaneshwar Chatare v. Returning Officer to the Election Appearance Petitione

The Allahabad High Court held that section 17 UP-Lokayukta And Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta Act Does Not Preclude High Court’s Authority Under Article 226
The Allahabad High Court held that section 17 UP-Lokayukta And Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta Act Does Not Preclude High Court’s Authority Under Article 226
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Masood Ahmad Khan v. State of UP and Ors. Decided on: 06 November, 2023 + Writ- A No. 10788 of 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Munir J Introdu

The Delhi High Court held that under the POCSO Act, a Light Touch Is Not “Manipulation” For Penetrative Sexual Assault
The Delhi High Court held that under the POCSO Act, a Light Touch Is Not “Manipulation” For Penetrative Sexual Assault
November 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Shantanu v. The State Decided on: 06 November, 2023 + CRL.A 160/2021 & CRL.M (BAIL) 121/2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Amit Bansal Intro

Bombay High  Court on proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been instituted seeking a declaration that Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code.
Bombay High Court on proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been instituted seeking a declaration that Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code.
November 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Bombay High  Court on proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been instituted seeking a declaration that Section 353 of th

Delhi High Court on The petitioners claim to have rights to the brand/mark “World Trade Center Faridabad”; “WTC Faridabad”; and WTC Logo
Delhi High Court on The petitioners claim to have rights to the brand/mark “World Trade Center Faridabad”; “WTC Faridabad”; and WTC Logo
November 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Delhi High Court on The petitioners claim to have rights to the brand/mark “World Trade Center Faridabad”; “WTC Faridabad”; and WTC Logo Ti

The Kerala High Court directed the competent authority of the Government of India to inform the Court about the best alternative available for breast cancer patients in India in terms of treatment medicines
The Kerala High Court directed the competent authority of the Government of India to inform the Court about the best alternative available for breast cancer patients in India in terms of treatment medicines
November 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: SMT.X v. UNION OF INDIA &. Ors. Citation: WP(C) NO. 18999 OF 2022 (Y) Decided on: 02.11.2023 Coram: Justice Devan Ramachandran Introduct

The Allahabad High Court quashed a penalty order, emphasizing that all information is accessible on the GST department’s portal, and it is the responsibility of the department to verify the details
The Allahabad High Court quashed a penalty order, emphasizing that all information is accessible on the GST department’s portal, and it is the responsibility of the department to verify the details
November 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: M/S Rama Brick Field v. Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And 2 Others Citation: WRIT TAX No. – 909 of 2022 Decided on: 6.11.2023 Coram:

Not obligatory to question the doctor who conducted the post-mortem examination if the accused does not challenge the authenticity of the post-mortem report: Orissa High Court
Not obligatory to question the doctor who conducted the post-mortem examination if the accused does not challenge the authenticity of the post-mortem report: Orissa High Court
November 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Leven Kerketta v. State of Odisha Citation: JCRLA No. 43 of 2008 Decided on: 02.11.2023 Coram: Justice Sangam Kumar Sahoo and Justice Chitta

Defection A Menace To Democracy, Stringent Financial Penalties Needed Against Defectors : Kerala High Court
Defection A Menace To Democracy, Stringent Financial Penalties Needed Against Defectors : Kerala High Court
November 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Deepak K. v The Kerala State Election Commission & connected case Decided on: 06.11.2023 Citation: WP(C) NO. 15253 OF 2023 and WP(C) NO.