Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Supreme Court relied on the principle that a transaction must satisfy the essential characteristics of a “sale” to be subjected to sales tax.
Supreme Court relied on the principle that a transaction must satisfy the essential characteristics of a “sale” to be subjected to sales tax.
January 11, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: M/s. K.P. Mozika vs Oil and Natural Gas  Corporation Ltd. & Ors Case No: CIVIL APPEAL NO.3548 OF 2017 Decided on: 09.0

FIRs should be individually evaluated, and no blanket restrictions should be imposed: Kerala High Court.
FIRs should be individually evaluated, and no blanket restrictions should be imposed: Kerala High Court.
January 11, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Rohith Giri vs State of Kerela Case No: WP (CRL.) NO. 1349 OF 2023 Decided on: 04.01.2024 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Tho

District Courts to Enforce Mandatory E-Filing and Digitization for Civil and Criminal Cases: Delhi High Court
January 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title:  Karan S Thukral v. The District & Sessions Judge & Ors Case No: W.P.(C) No. 6082 of 2019 Decided on:  4th January, 2024 CORA

Decision to remove DGP cannot be reversed, and a fair investigation cannot be compromised to preserve the reputation of the officers: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Decision to remove DGP cannot be reversed, and a fair investigation cannot be compromised to preserve the reputation of the officers: Himachal Pradesh High Court
January 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title:  Court on its own motion v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. Case No: Cr.MP. No.79 and 84 of 2024 in CR. WP No.14 of 2023 Decided on

Jharkhand HC quashes criminal proceedings against company and director for non compliance with CGST summons
Jharkhand HC quashes criminal proceedings against company and director for non compliance with CGST summons
January 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Satyendra Singh Kushwaha v The State of Jharkhand Citation:  Cr.M.P. No. 2454 of 2019 Dated on: 19.6.2019 Corum:  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SA

The accused’s physical presence is not mandatory during the proceedings for the recall of a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW): HC of Telengana
The accused’s physical presence is not mandatory during the proceedings for the recall of a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW): HC of Telengana
January 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Citation: Criminal Petition NO: 12140 of 2023 Dated on: 5.12.2023 Corum:  The Hon’ble Mr. Justice T. MADHAVI DEVI   Facts of the Case Th

The accused’s physical presence is not mandatory during the proceedings for the recall of a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW): HC of Telengana
The accused’s physical presence is not mandatory during the proceedings for the recall of a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW): HC of Telengana
January 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Citation: Criminal Petition NO: 12140 of 2023 Dated on: 5.12.2023 Corum:  The Hon’ble Mr. Justice T. MADHAVI DEVI   Facts of the Case Th

Rajasthan High Court was not justified in issuing the mandamus as it failed to consider the significant impact on both consumer and public interests: Supreme court
Rajasthan High Court was not justified in issuing the mandamus as it failed to consider the significant impact on both consumer and public interests: Supreme court
January 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. Vs MB power (Madhya Pradesh)             Ltd. & Ors. Case No: CIVIL APPEAL N

The State of Gujarat had no jurisdiction to entertain the prayers seeking remission of the convicts: Supreme court
The State of Gujarat had no jurisdiction to entertain the prayers seeking remission of the convicts: Supreme court
January 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Bilkis Yakub Rasool vs Union of India & Ors. Case No: WP (CRL.) NO.491 OF 2022 Decided on: 08.01.2024 Coram: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice

Police Constable cannot withdraw his resignation and cannot be reinstated to his position: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Police Constable cannot withdraw his resignation and cannot be reinstated to his position: Madhya Pradesh High Court
January 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Madhav Prasad Pandey v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. Case No: WP No. 938 of 2013 Decided on: 4th January, 2024 CORAM: THE HON’B