blog - Page 127 of 994 - Prime Legal Law Firm

Power to record additional evidence should only be exercised when the party was prevented from presenting the evidence in the trial: Supreme Court

Case title: Ajitsinh Chehuji Rathod vs State of Gujarat & Anr. Case no.: SLP(Crl.) No(s). 16641 of 2023 Decided on: 29.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’bl

High Court Chief Justices should oversee trials and ensure swift resolution of criminal cases involving MPs and MLAs: SC

Title: ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 699 OF 2016 Date of Judgment- November 9, 2023 CORAM- CJI. Dr.

Supreme Court Redefines Junior Office Assistant Recruitment Amid Legal Debates and Eligibility Controversies in Himachal Pradesh

TITLE: ANKITA THAKUR & ORS. V. THE H.P. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. CITATION: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7602 OF 2023 DECIDED ON: 9 NOVEMBE

Inconsistencies in Modi Naturals Ltd: Supreme Court Interprets the VAT Act’s

Case Title: M/S Modi Naturals Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Commercial Tax Up Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5822-5823 OF 2023 Decided On: 06.11.2023

IBC Provisions for Individuals Deemed Constitutional: Right to Privacy Balanced with Resolution Process Needs

Case Title: Dilip B Jiwrajka v. Union of India & Ors. Case No.: Writ Petition (Civil) No 1281 of 2021 Decided On: 09.11.2023 Coram: Hon

Power Battle Unveiled – The Legal Confrontation between MSEDCL and RGPPL over Fixed Charges in the Face of Gas Shortage: SC

TITLE: MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED V. RATNAGIRI GAS AND POWER PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.. CITATION: CIVIL APPEAL NO.

Supereme court orders to establish Central empowered committee to address issues regarding forest, environment and wildlife

Title: IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD v UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Citation: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 202/1995 Dated on: 31.1.2024 Corum: HON’

Appeal filed with dishonest intention and lack of evidence can not stand in SC : Justice Anirudh Bose J.

Title: SACHIN GAG V STATE OF UP Citation: CRIMINAL APPEAL (Arising out of Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No.4415 OF 2023) Dated

A contemnor does not continue to reap the benefits of his disobedience by simply suffering the punishment meted out to him: Supreme Court

Case title: Amit Kumar Das Vs Shrimati Hutheesingh Tagore Charitable Trust. Case no.: SLP (Civil) no. 34892 of 2014 Decided on: 30.01.2024 Quorum:

Maintaining a sexual relationship with consent from the inception is not an offence: Supreme Court

Case title: Sheikh Arif vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. Case no.: Criminal appeal no. 1368 of 2013 Decided on: 30.01.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Just

Blogs And Articles