The court dismissed the bail order after finding irrelevant considerations: Supreme Court of India
The relevant factors which should have been taken into consideration while dealing with the application for bail have not been taken note of, or ba
Affinity test may not be regarded as a litmus test for establishing the link of the applicant with a scheduled tribe: Bombay High Court
Rejection of claim of petitioners on the ground of failure to establish cultural affinity is absolutely unwarranted such findings cannot be legally
Passing Off claim rejected, Serum Institue’s ‘Covishield’ cannot be confused with hand sanitizers bearing the same name: Bombay High Court
Order of injunction in passing off cases ensures that no one should present his goods and services to the customers as of another party with goodwi
Provision of one trial against a person for multiple offences under Section 138 of the Act committed within a period of 12 months: Supreme Court
Concerned with the large number of cases filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 pending at various levels, a Division Benc
The cooling off period in mutual consent divorce can be waived by the Court under special circumstances: High Court of Delhi
The divorce, being one of mutual consent, the parties cannot be put to such grave inconvenience due to the action of the Family Court which has fai
Where a service related claim is based on a continuing wrong, relief can be granted even if there is a long delay in seeking remedy: Delhi High Court
In matter pertaining to administrative law, it held by the Delhi High Court bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw J. and Amit Bansal J. in of Civil Audit Ass
Where the material facts and identity of the accused are known, complainant should lead evidence before the trial court U/S. 200 Cr.P.C: High Court of Delhi
In the facts and circumstances of a particular case, Magistrate may take cognizance on the basis of the complaint instituted before him and may ado
Unsafe to conclude one way or the other that an arbitration agreement exists between the parties on a limited prima facie review of facts: Supreme Court of India
The determination whether the MoU had been novated by the Share Holders Agreement would require a detailed consideration of the Agreements, and sur
Owing to grave injury to the mental health of the rape victim, termination of a 26 weeks pregnancy allowed: High Court of Kerala
The word “shall be presumed” in Section 3 the MTP Act, 1971, clearly shows the intention of the legislature. In the case of rape, anguish on ac
The vehicle was not a public conveyance but was a vehicle belonging private person: Supreme Court of India
The explanation to Section 43 shows that a private vehicle would not come within the expression “public place”, the relevant provision would no
