Primelegal Team, Author at Prime Legal Law Firm

Inherent powers under S.482 Cr.P.C. not to be used in quashing FIRs under S.376 IPC: High Court of Delhi

Court cannot be inclined to quash the FIR in which offense under Section 376 IPC has been leveled against the petitioner, for the reasons that an o

Court sitting in revisional jurisdiction does not act as a court of appeal : High Court of Delhi

The High Court has only to see whether the learned ARC has committed any jurisdictional error and has passed order on the basis of material availab

Under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, Court has Right to Exercise its power to Hand Over Custody: Supreme Court of India

In exercise of power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, directing, to handover custody to the State of Uttar Pradesh, within a period

Determination of seniority to be governed by Seniority Rules enforced at the Time of Appointment of the Personnel: Supreme Court of India

For determination of seniority which is a different concept and determination of seniority is governed by seniority rules enforced at the time of a

Liberty to Pursue the Rights and Remedies of Due Debt Falling Within the Ambit of the Arbitration: Supreme Court of India

The liberty to pursue their rights and remedies in pursuance of the arbitration clause contained in the Concession Agreements on all PART (F) 67 ma

Article 75 of the Articles of Association is nothing but a provision for an exit option: Supreme Court of India

After attacking Article 75 before NCLT, the S.P. Group cannot ask this Court to go into the question of fixation of fair value compensation for exe

Section 86(1)(f) vests a statutory jurisdiction: Supreme court of India

The appellant cannot raise an objection relying on Section 86(1)(f) of the 2003 Act and Section 86(1)(f) vests a statutory jurisdiction with the St

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is a special enactment for resolution of a financial debt: Supreme Court of India

There was no substance to the second ground urged by the appellant regarding the maintainability of the application filed by the respondent financi

Arbitral Tribunal ought to decide the objection under Section 16 of the Act as a preliminary ground : High Court of Delhi

Section 16 of the Arbitration Act states that issues of jurisdiction ought to be raised before the Arbitrator at the earliest and such objection ha

NCLAT rightly refused to stay the proceedings before the NCLT as section 14 does not strictly apply: Supreme court of India

The judgment and order of the NCLT do not warrant interference and that the NCLAT rightly refused to stay the proceedings before the NCLT as Sectio

Blogs And Articles