Successor shall be entitled to hold the service land of the holder: Chhattisgarh High Court
Provision of Section 183 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 does not grant the proprietary right to a Kotwar in any manner and there is
Dispute between parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC successfully resolved by way of Mediation and Conciliation: The High Court of Delhi
Fraudulent representations made by the respondents to secure investments from the petitioner company, which were further misappropriated and siphon
Non-mentioning of the probation period in their appointment orders cannot deprive from benefits to which they are otherwise entitled: Chhattisgarh High court
In the present case, the question of law and fact is the same in all these writs and hence they were clubbed together. The petitioners in the prese
Petitioner charged for offences punishable under Sections 328, 389 and 34 IPC, granted bail: The High Court of Delhi
Just because the complainant is alleging that he is getting threatening calls, it will not be appropriate to keep the accused in custody and the Co
Mere complaints of threatening call, is not an appropriate reason to keep the accused in custody: High Court of Delhi.
When there is no substantial reason to detain the accused in custody, against whom a complaint had been registered, then such accused can be grante
No person shall drive a motor vehicle in any public place unless he holds an effective driving licence issued to him authorising him to drive the vehicle.: High court of Punjab and Haryana
The petitioner was convicted under section 279 Indian Penal Code, i.e. “Rash driving or riding on a public way. i.e., Whoever drives any vehicle,
Petitioner denied to seek refund of excess advance tax on the grounds of it being a stale claim: The High Court of Delhi
It is settled law that representations made by the Petitioner would not extend the period of limitation. The aforesaid law has also been relied upo
Failure by CIT(A) and ITAT to disclose incriminating material against the accused led to the court finding no substantial question of law arising in the case, hence leading to its dismissal: The High court of Delhi
No assessment/reassessment proceedings were pending when search action took place and hence no assessment was abated. The addition made by the AO i
Bail granted to one Convicted under section 15,61,85 of the NDPS act because she had a child: High court of Punjab and Haryana
The petitioner was convicted under section 15-B of the NDPS act, “Punishment for contravention in relation to poppy straw, where the contraventio
Where the wife has sufficient income to maintain herself, she will not qualify for getting alimony for herself: Calcutta High Court.
Within the contemplation of section 36 of the Special Marriage Act, a wife will not qualify for getting alimony for herself, if she has sufficient
