No obligation to provide clarification or opinion regarding a future event under RTI Act: SEBI .
When somebody seeks information regarding the time to be taken for the recovery proceedings to be settled, then the person who is to reply does not
“Principal Secretary made changes to the transfer order..”: High Court Of Jammu And Kashmir At Srinagar.
Principal Secretary to Hon’ble Chief Justice Rajeev Gupta adjudicated in the matter with regard to Order No. 483 of 2021/RG/Psy dated 8th July 20
“Is silence the answer?” says Respondent in the court of SEBI, Part 1.
The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr Amarjeet Singh adju
“Is silence the answer?” says Respondent in the court of SEBI, Part 2.
The respondent, in response to the query number 1, informed that SEBI had received the said letter. The respondent also informed that as a defaulte
“Is silence the answer?” says Respondent in the court of SEBI, Part 3.
With respect to query number 5, it was noted that the appellant sought information regarding action taken by SEBI after receiving documents of the
Panchayat cannot postpone the disposal of show cause notice if pending before the Additional Director: High Court of Bombay at Goa
Unless there is no stay granted by the Additional Director of Panchayat, Village Panchayat cannot postpone the disposal of the show cause notice, m
Amendment to claim is allowed even the matter is posted for final hearing: High Court of Bombay at Goa
If the amendment doesn’t bring a drastic change in the nature of proceedings and when it is necessary to determine the real controversy between t
Petitioner released on bail after being arrested under Sections 354-A, 504, 337, 506/34 IPC and 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012: High court of Patna
The petitioner was arrested under Section 354-A Indian penal code, “punishment for sexual harassment” section 504, “Intentional insult with i
Only if advocate on record indicates that personal allegations have been made against the members of the arbitral, they may be impleaded; or else, their names should be deleted: Madras High Court
The advocate on record must be enquired seeking to file a petition under Section 34 of the Act wherein the members of the arbitral tribunal have be
Petition can be amended ONLY IF the petitioner would be constrained to file a new application under Section 34 for challenging the Award under the additional grounds: Calcutta High Court.
The test to determine if a petition which is already filed can be allowed for amendment is to check if the petitioner would be constrained to file
