Claim to succession cannot be decided by a Revenue Tribunal: Telangana High Court
The claim of petitioners to succeed to tenancy rights of their ancestor cannot be decided by the Tahsildar and appropriate remedy from the civil co
Application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI act is not an automatic stay: Madras High Court
Merely on the ground that an application filed by the petitioner under Section 17 of the Act challenging the auction sale is pending, it cannot be
Petitioners released on bail after being arrested under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 333, 337, 324, 307, 353, 188 IPC.: High court of Patna
The petitioner was arrested under Section 147 IPC, “Punishment for rioting”, section 148, “Rioting, armed with deadly weapon̶
Petitioner released on bail after being arrested under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354B/34IPC: High court of Patna
The petitioner was arrested on the 11th of June 2020 under Section 341 IPC, “Punishment for wrongful restraint.” section 323, “Punishment for
FIR Quashed when the parties amicably settled the dispute: High Court of Uttarakhand.
Where there is a genuine compromise and there is hardly any likelihood of the offender being convicted, then FIR should be quashed. A single Judge
Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual: High Court of Uttarakhand.
Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception. The object of keeping the accused person in detention during the trial is not punishment, b
Appeal for Sentence modification granted to the Appellant: High court Of Bombay
In the present case, an appeal is arising out of the judgment and order dated 21.02.2018 where the appellant has been convicted for the offense pun
Convict released on parole even when he was not able to pay the surety amount: High Court of Bombay
Parole refers to when an individual serving a term of imprisonment gets released into the community, but remains under the supervision of a parole
“It is open for the appellant to file a fresh appeal as per law, if he is not satisfied with the reply provided by the respondent…”: Appellate Authority, SEBI.
The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Amarjeet Singh adj
“Response to the query would be an answer either affirmative or negative, depending on the available records…”: Appellate Authority, SEBI, Part 3.
Further, in the matter of Shri Shantaram Walavalkar vs. CPIO, SEBI (Decision dated January 17, 2013), it was noted that the Hon’ble CIC held: “
