“the requested information is exempt under section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act…”: SEBI, Part 2.
The respondent, in response to query number 3(2), informed that the requested information is exempt under section 8(1)(d) and 8(1)(e) of the RTI Ac
“the requested information is exempt under section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act…”: SEBI, Part 1.
The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjud
Based on one selection process initiated, one cannot claim for a post without participating in the selection process: Calcutta High Court
The prayer for rejection of the consideration report of the District Project Officer dated 23rd June 2009, could not be passed and the petitioner c
There is no illegality in culling out a table from a different but an equivalent rule for recruitment of school teachers by the Madrasah Service Commission for teachers of Madrasah: Calcutta High Court
All the candidates for the posts of Madrasah teachers will be assessed according to ‘Part-C’ of the School Service Commission Rules, 2016, as h
Accused held guilty based on the statement of eye witnesses and medical reports: The Supreme Court of India
Considering the material on record including the eyewitness’s account as well as the corroborative pieces of material, it is firmly established t
In cases related to matrimonial disputes, a preliminary inquiry must be conducted before the FIR is filed: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
In Matrimonial or family disputes, a preliminary enquiry must be conducted before the FIR is filed to determine whether a cognizable offence has be
Maintenance to the second wife: A Gender Justice Perspective
Badshah v Urmila Badshah (2013): A case about maintenance to the second wife Introduction: The year 2013 marked a very interesting case of Badshah
It cannot be said that this is a case where no opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner and that there was any violation of the principle of natural justice: Calcutta High Court
It seemed that the petitioner could not make out a case of any patent jurisdictional error or that the assessing officer acted contrary to any spec
As regards discrepancy, when the judgment is confronted with discrepancies in evidence on record, it does not necessarily demolish testimony: Calcutta High Court
Since punishment had been awarded in respect of the major charge under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, it would be unnecessary to inflict the
The true nature and import of the offence of criminal conspiracy is to be considered: Bombay High Court
Conspiracy to commit an offence is by itself a substantive offence and entails punishment. Every individual offence committed in pursuance of such
