Court upholds the procedural aspect of section 245 of the Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court
It is the duty of the income tax authority to be governed by the mechanics of the Income Tax Act, 1961. A parallel situation was observed in the re
It is unfortunate how a piece of social welfare legislation intended to protect a voiceless section of society is sought to be circumvented by filing such frivolous petitions : Calcutta High Court
The entire object of filing such petition was to procrastinate and delay the recovery proceedings initiated by the respondent authorities. The Honâ
Central Government can authorize initiation of proceedings and the relief of freezing assets and disgorgement of property: Delhi High Court
Central Government can authorize initiation of proceedings and the relief of freezing assets and disgorgement of property as per the virtue of sect
Court directs to give twelve weeks in order to prove the claims for pro-rata pension eligibility: Delhi High Court
Pro-rata pension system has to be subjected to 15 years of services in the Air Force. If otherwise, exceptions are proven, then a lower set of time
The act of the respondent is not considered when any empanelled candidate did not feel aggrieved by the act caused: High Court Of Calcutta
Getting an appointment as Assistant Professor in the subject Geography, belonging to the OBC- A category was an issue in the case and, this was hel
Further extension can be sought for the Arbitral tribunal to prepare and announce the award, if the records are voluminous: Delhi High Court
Arbitration and mediation is a very effective and efficient tools for resolving disputes that arise in between the parties while carrying out the t
Courts cannot formulate guidelines for regulation of Media: Kerala High Court
We have no hesitation to hold that public interest litigation to frame guidelines to restrict the media on the basis of the allegations made in the
It is not necessary to hear the complainant/victim during bail hearing for a bailable offence under the SC/ST Act. It was however clarified that be
The petitioner no. 2 was arrested merely on suspicion; hence the Court is inclined to allow the prayer for pre-arrest bail.: High court of Patna
 The petitioner no. 2 was taken into custody under Sections 302 IPC, “Punishment for murder.—Whoever commits murder shall be punished with dea
The father of the petitioner is responsible for the crime, as he coerced the informant’s husband to commit an illegal activity which resulted in his death.: High court of Patna
The petitioner was arrested under Sections 188 IPC, “Disobedience to order duly promulgated by a public servant”, section 269, “Negligent act
