The petitioner was arrested under Section 272 IPC, “Adulteration of food or drink intended for sale whoever adulterates any article of food or dr
The petitioner was arrested under Section 272 IPC, “Adulteration of food or drink intended for sale whoever adulterates any article of food or dr
When a complaint discloses the commission of a cognizable offence while filing an FIR, the arrest cannot be merely done through registration of an
The petitioner was taken into custody under Section 498A IPC, “Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty”, section 50
In the proceedings dated 09.08.2021, learned counsel submitted on behalf of the appellant that he was willing to pay compensation of Rs.3.00 lakhs
In context of the Criminal Appeal No .894 Of 2021, Samaul Sk. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr., Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul passed the judgment
Any material that could be potentially defamatory, cannot be shared or forwarded carelessly especially in this modern day and age of internet. This
The Supreme Court ruled that the railways would be liable for compensation unless they provided proof and explained why a train arrived late, estab
The Supreme Court ruled that by following the procedure outlined in Section 25 of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, a Director of Enforce
The default was suppose to undergo simple Imprisonment for a period of one month, this was held in the judgement passed by a single bench judge com
It appeared that the power under Section 482 Crpc cannot be exercised by this Court to re-appreciate the same material, which was available before