The petitioner no. 2 was taken into custody under Sections 302 IPC, “Punishment for murder.—Whoever commits murder shall be punished with dea
The petitioner no. 2 was taken into custody under Sections 302 IPC, “Punishment for murder.—Whoever commits murder shall be punished with dea
The petitioner was arrested under Sections 188 IPC, “Disobedience to order duly promulgated by a public servant”, section 269, “Negligent act
The petitioner apprehended arrest under Sections 427 IPC, “Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees”, section 353, “Assault or c
There was an issue raised by the Estate Officer, under the provisions of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (“the
The court is of the opinion that this confusion could have been averted if there were proper checks in place at different levels of counselling. Th
In a fresh matter in Delhi High Court, the parties applied for decreeing the settlement agreement, when arbitration failed due to ex-parte proceedi
The Delhi High Court, in a matter, upheld the plea of the petitioners filed to be placed at par and demanded equal treatment like all his batch-mat
The complete prohibition of practices that are essential to our religions is an extraordinary measure, it is very much in proportion to the unprece
Every citizen has the right occupy public office; however, it must be done so only when the that right is rightfully obtained. This was held in the
The impugned order dated 20th July 2019, passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kalyani, Nadia in T .S. No. 141 of 2014, rejecting the ha