It cannot be laid down as a proposition of law that once an order of maintenance has been passed by any Court then the same cannot be re-adjudicate
It cannot be laid down as a proposition of law that once an order of maintenance has been passed by any Court then the same cannot be re-adjudicate
It was found that all the reasons to extend benefits to the present Appellants (Claimants) in the matter of determination of compensation for their
Willful disobedience by the contemnor undermining the dignity and authority of the Courts and outraging the majesty of law shall be punishable in
Rule 41 (5) would not apply to the transfer from a junior college to secondary school though run by the same Management in case of non-teaching sta
There must be a cogent and clear indication in the reasons supplied, that in fact there was a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully
It is the legality and validity of the orders, which is the subject matter of challenge in the present proceeding. Such an opinion was held by The
Unless “sufficient cause” was shown for the non-appearance of the defendant in the case on the date of hearing, the court had no power to set a
The petition was filed under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of letter of administration, and the same issue was held in t
It does not matter that there was no intention even to cause the injury of a kind that is sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature. E
The doctrine of promissory estoppels mandates that the Government cannot escape its liability when a citizen has altered his position relying upon