Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The arbitral tribunal may require a party to provide appropriate security in connection with a measure ordered under sub-section: High Court Of New Delhi
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The present appeal is directed against an order dated 17th April 2021 passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal, on an application under Section 17 o

In matrimonial cases, the convenience of the wife is the dominating factor for justifying transfer of a matter.
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

There is no straight-jacket formula that can be adopted in order to determine the transfer proceedings. It is not a mandatory rule that the transfe

A married daughter is eligible for an appointment on a compassionate basis: Allahabad High Court
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Exclusion of a married daughter from the ambit of expression of “family” as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Rules is illegal and unconstitutiona

Failure of placing proper evidence before the Court creates serious doubt on cases, for which the accused is liable to get the benefit of Section-84 of IPC: High Court of Tripura
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The prosecution had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt and hence, the order of acquittal recorded by the learned Sessions Judge does

The provision of bail as laid down in Section 167 of the Cr.P.C. has been held to be a mandatory provision and is termed as the “default bail”: Gauhati High Court
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The right to be released on bail under Section 167 (2) Proviso (a) was indefeasible right and subsequent filing of the charge sheet did not disting

Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. any order passed by compromise or otherwise cannot prevent the remedy stated under Section 18 of HAMA: High Court Of Chhattisgarh
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Maintenance application decided under one statute would not foreclose the claim for maintenance under a different statute. Such an opinion was held

Consideration of the matters involving tribal communities would not be complete without a reference to the constitutional provision of the Sixth Schedule.: Meghalaya High Court
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Cases between the parties, particularly those who belongs to the Scheduled Tribe community of the State of Meghalaya as far as jurisdiction is conc

Reinstatement is not an automatic consequence of wrongful termination: Delhi High Court
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The Supreme Court has clearly recognised the fact that reinstatement is not an automatic consequence of wrongful termination, especially when the W

In the case of workmen who are governed by the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, the applicability of the Gratuity Act has to be considered: High Court of Delhi
In the case of workmen who are governed by the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, the applicability of the Gratuity Act has to be considered: High Court of Delhi
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, while referring to the judgments in the case of Union of India v. Ramesh Chand [W.P.(C.) 6115/2021 and Union of

If investigation not completed within 90 days, the custody of an accused under Unlawful Activities Act can be extended up to 180 days: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
November 26, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Section 43D(2) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act read into Section 167 of the Cr.P.C in its application to cases for offences relating to ULA