Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Starbucks Corporation filed a case on TEAQUILA A FASHION CAFE & ANR. In Teaquila A Fashion Café in High Court Of Delhi

Decree of damages is passed in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. Cost of Rs.9,60,100/- is awarded in f

To Adjudicate Employee’s Claim Under Section 33C(2) ID Act In An Undetermined Claim: In Karnataka High Court

According to the Karnataka High Court, a worker who seeks compensation for injuries sustained on the job must file his claim with the Employees Com

Adopting Child Directly From Biological Parents Not An Offence Under Section 80 Juvenile Justice Act: In Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court ruled that without a declaration that a child has been abandoned by his biological or adoptive parents or guardians, filin

To Levy Advertisement Fee or Advertisement Tax, No Conflict Between Power To Levy GST And Power Of Municipal Corporation: In Karnataka High Court
To Levy Advertisement Fee or Advertisement Tax, No Conflict Between Power To Levy GST And Power Of Municipal Corporation: In Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court said that that there is no conflict between the power to levy GST under the GST Act and the power of a municipal corporati

The petitioner is entitled to refund of adjustments made in excess of the disputed tax demands and set off of refunds against tax payable: High Court Of Delhi
The petitioner is entitled to refund of adjustments made in excess of the disputed tax demands and set off of refunds against tax payable: High Court Of Delhi

The petitioner is entitled to refund of adjustments made in excess of 20% of the disputed tax demands and Rs.30,000/- set off of refunds against ta

The only non-bailable Section invoked against him is Section 67(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000: High Court Of Delhi
The only non-bailable Section invoked against him is Section 67(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000: High Court Of Delhi

The petitioner/accused be released on execution of personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with a surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learne

Unless Manifest Arbitrariness affects, Prescription Of Qualification For Recruitment Outside Domain Of Judicial Review: In Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition challenging a government notification that amended the Karnataka Education Department Services (Depar

If Prosecution Fails To Prove Presence Of Accused At Murder Scene, No Adverse Inference U/S 114 Indian Evidence Act: In Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court ruled that if the prosecution fails to prove the accused’s presence at the scene of the crime, it is not appropriate

That Period Must Be Counted For Seeking Default Bail U/S 167(2) CrPC, Liberty Of Accused Lost If Secured On Body Warrant: In Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has reiterated that even if the accused is secured on the body warrant, his or her liberty is fortified, and that period w

Adjudicating Authority Is Not Bound By The Recommendation Of The Resolution Professional Under Section 99 Of The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Karnataka High Court
Adjudicating Authority Is Not Bound By The Recommendation Of The Resolution Professional Under Section 99 Of The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Karnataka High Court

In its recent decision in the case of Sri Babu A Dhammanagi vs Union of India on April 5, 2022, a division bench of the Karnataka High Court dismis