Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
State cannot interfere with ancient religious practices in temples: Kerala High Court
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Kerala, through learned judge, Justice P.G Ajith Kumar and Justice Anil K Narendren  in the case Suo Motu vs State of Kerala and

Detaining authority cannot pass a detention order when the acts committed by the detenu doesn’t come under the ambit of public order: Telangana High Court
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Telangana through the learned bench led by a Division Bench of CHIEF JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SIN

Appeal was dismissed because no corroboration was found from the evidence of any other witness and medical evidence : Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Shivnarayan vs Mahesh Patel (CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3368 of 2015) dismissed the appeal because no corrobo

Under M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 a person can be removed from a district, if the acts of the person in question are alarming and dangerous to the safety of the persons or society at large : Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Taarik @ Bablu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh (WRIT PETITION No. 8689 of 2022) upheld that under M.P.

Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document or electronic record, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document or electronic record : Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Shrilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh (CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3021 of 2020) upheld that whoever fraudule

THE CORRECT VERIFICATION OF THE AGE AND THE DATE OF BIRTH WAS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR FOR THE RETIREMENT: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice G.K.Mishra in the case of State Of Orissa V Bi

THERE IS NO MANDATE UNDER THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987 TO MOVE APPLICATIONS FOR VICTIM COMPENSATION COMPULSORILY THROUGH DLSAS/LSAS: ODISHA HIGH COURT
THERE IS NO MANDATE UNDER THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987 TO MOVE APPLICATIONS FOR VICTIM COMPENSATION COMPULSORILY THROUGH DLSAS/LSAS: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Arindam Sinha in the case of Sukuludei Santa v

A TRANSGENDER HAS ALL THE RIGHTS TO CHOOSE THEIR GENDER: ODISHA HIGH COURT
A TRANSGENDER HAS ALL THE RIGHTS TO CHOOSE THEIR GENDER: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra in the case of Kantaro

Using another’s image, and most especially a private image, without consent is prima facie impermissible, unlawful and entirely illegal: Bombay High Court
Using another’s image, and most especially a private image, without consent is prima facie impermissible, unlawful and entirely illegal: Bombay High Court
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court held that a person’s image cannot be used for a commercial purpose, without his/her express written consent through Justice

The absence of ‘dishonest concealment of fact’ exempts a person from being punished under Section 147 of the IPC: Bombay High Court
June 13, 2022by Primelegal Team0

A decision that the absence of ‘dishonest concealment of fact’ exempts a person from being punished under Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code,