Can A Kazi Adjudicate Disputes And Issue Orders Like A Court? Madhya Pradesh HC answers.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in the case of Aadil v. Union of India and others (W.P No.24741/2018), through the Division Bench of Vivek Rusia and
‘Habeas Corpus Not Maintainable When Detention Is Under The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018’: Madhya Pradesh HC
In the matter of Gautam Das & Others v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others (Writ Petition No.26319/2019), the Madhya Pradesh High Court
‘Convict Himself Has Minor Daughter, Chances Of Rehabilitation Can’t Be Ruled Out’: Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench.
In the case of Madhya Pradesh Versus Ankit Vijayvargiya S (CRRFC No.2/2020 and CRA No.3665/2020), the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench recen
GOVERNMENT BEING A MODEL EMPLOYER CANNOT BE SEEN TO TAKE STEPS TO SECOND-GUESS ITS OPPONENT IN LITIGATION LIKE A PRIVATE LITIGANT: ODISHA HIGH COURT
This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Sashikanta Mishra in the case of Amar Kumar Be
IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT IF THERE IS ARBITRARINESS AND UNREASONABLENESS AND THE ORDER IS TELL-TALE ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD, THEN THIS COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN THE WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: ODISHA HIGH COURT
This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice B.R Sarangi in the case of SRB Transport, Samb
A person cannot be faulted with or stigmatized without providing him the reasonable opportunity of defense : Tripura High Court
The Tripura High Court in the case of Ditul Debbarma vs State Of Tripura And Others (WP(C)No.225 of 2020) upheld that a person cannot be faulted wi
WHERE VALUABLE RIGHTS ARE SOUGHT TO BE TAKEN AWAY BY THE GOVERNMENT IN DEPRIVING OF A PERSON DEALING WITH IT, THE WRIT COURTS CANNOT ACT AS MERE SPECTATOR AND SHALL INTERVENE TO DO JUSTICE TO THE AGGRIEVED PARTY: ODISHA HIGH COURT
This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Dr. Justice B.R. Sarangi and Mr. Justice S.K.
GOVERNMENT BEING A MODEL EMPLOYER CANNOT BE SEEN TO TAKE STEPS TO SECOND-GUESS ITS OPPONENT IN LITIGATION LIKE A PRIVATE LITIGANT: ODISHA HIGH COURT
This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Sashikanta Mishra in the case of Amar Kumar Be
IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT IF THERE IS ARBITRARINESS AND UNREASONABLENESS AND THE ORDER IS TELL-TALE ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD, THEN THIS COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN THE WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: ODISHA HIGH COURT
This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice B.R Sarangi in the case of SRB Transport, Samb
If the accused had knowledge that his action of causing injuries upon the body of the victim is likely to cause death but whether he had actual intention to cause death upon the victim cannot be established it will amount to culpable homicide, not murder : Tripura High Court
The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Kalipada Roy vs The State Of Tripura (CRL.A (J) NO.47 OF 2020) upheld that if the accused had knowledge t
