Permission granted to have DNA test done: Kerala High Court
Permission granted to have DNA test done by the Kerala High Court in the case of XXX v. XXX (OP (FC) No. 679 of 2019) through a bench of A.Muhamed
When teachers are advising their students to study carefully and to explain the derivation or equation, it is part and parcel of the education, and it would not amount to aiding in suicide: Madras High Court
When teachers are advising their students to study carefully and to explain the derivation or equation, it is part and parcel of the education, and
A husband in an illicit relationship cannot ask the Court to dissolve his valid marriage in order to legalise his illicit union with another lady
A husband in an illicit relationship cannot ask the Court to dissolve his valid marriage in order to legalise his illicit union with another lady i
Main point of discussion would be the age of the prosecutrix in order to determine as to whether she was major so as to give her consent: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The appeal succeeds and stands partly allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of JITENDRA V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH thro
The employee is not entitled to the salary when he fails to render service to the employer on principle of “no work no pay”: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The writ petition is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of UPENDRA SINGH V. STATE OF M.P. through HON’BLE JUSTIC
Section 15 (5) in juxtaposition with 15-C of the Act leaves no manner of doubt that bar of jurisdiction to pass the order on an application under Sections 451 and 457 of the Code would operate only on receipt of information by the concerned Magistrate under Sub Section (5) of Section 15 of the Act regarding initiation of proceedings for confiscation of the property: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.8820/2022 stands allowed and disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of SAHIL KHAN V.
Notice of Voluntarily retirement does not require corresponding acceptance of appointing authority: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The appeal stands allowed and the impugned order dated 8.7.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. No.13815/2021 is hereby se
The petitioner in order to avail the undue benefit of the scheme has filed the belated return by contending that the filing of such belated return is permissible and claimed the deduction of income as well as the refund of the tax: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The court is not inclined to interfere with the order dated 29.03.2001 passed by the Commissioner, Income-tax. Hence, Writ Petition is hereby dismi
The information wrongly given by the petitioner was not a very material information: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to consider the candidature of petitioner for the post of Office Assistant (Multi-purpose) and
As a result, it is held that the trial Court has not committed any error in rejecting the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC filed by the non-applicants: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The revision being devoid of merits is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of AKHILESH ANJANA V. KAVITA ANJANA t
