Moonlighting: Is It Worth It?
Work is an important part of people’s lives. It means more than just getting paid. It means being able to make your own choices about how you wan
Litigant Entitled To Refund Of Court Fees If Matter Settled Outside Court Even Without Invocation Of Section 89 of CPC: MP High Court
Recently, the Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a litigant is entitled to a refund of court expenses if the subject at question has been handled
Mere Issuance of Notice Does Not Attract Doctrine of ‘Stare Decisis’ : MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
It has been reaffirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court that the mere issuing of notice on a petition does not impose a ‘binding precedent
Take Reasonable Care To Avoid Acts Or Omissions Which Can Be Reasonably Foreseen: House of Lords
In the case of Bolton v. Stone [1951] AC 850, a landmark judgement on tort of negligence was delivered by the House of Lords. It established that
Company’s Indoor Affairs Are The Company’s Problems – The Rule of Indoor Management by The Court of Exchequer
In the case of Royal British Bank v Turquand (1856) 6 E&B 327, popularly known as The Turquand’s case by Sir John Jervis CJ of the Court of
A PIL Not Maintainable In Service Matters: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court dismissed public interest litigation filed by Divya Rajesh Hagaragi, a prime accused in the Police Sub-Inspector Recruitme
Proceedings of Criminal Nature Can’t Be Used For ‘Recovery Of Money’ Unless Offence Of Cheating/ Criminal Breach Of Trust Is Established: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court has said that criminal law cannot be set into motion for recovery of money paid under a contract unless the offence of che
Indication of lowest acceptable price does not constitute an offer to sell: Privy Council
The case of Harvey vs Facey ([1893] AC 552), is an important case law in contract law as it defines the difference between an invitation to offer
Prerogative powers of the monarch and government are subordinate to the law of the land: King’s Bench
In the case of Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1030, constitutional implications for common law jurisdictions overpowered across the globe. Itâ
After attaching signatures to the GST Registration Cancellation Order, the limitation period begins: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that the limitation period would start only after the affixing of signatures on the GST registration cancellation
