Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Powers of the Criminal Courts in India granted by THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
Powers of the Criminal Courts in India granted by THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
January 7, 2023by Primelegal Team

Crime is a highly complex phenomenon that evolves across cultures and across time. Increase in population, technological advancements and heightene

CONTINUE READING
India: A secular state
January 7, 2023by Primelegal Team

Abstract- India is a fusion of numerous religions and communities. The reason is that India is the birthplace of many religions, including Hinduism

CONTINUE READING
Preventive detention is devised to afford protection to society. The object is not to punish a man for having done something but to intercept before he does it and to prevent him from doing it.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 27th of December, 2022 in which the high court quashed the petition filed by the

CONTINUE READING
The disputed questions of fact, cannot be gone into by the writ court while exercising the power of judicial review vested in it by Article 226 of the Constitution of India.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 23rd of December 2022 in which the court dismissed the petition as it was without

CONTINUE READING
Employee’s action can’t hold License Holders vicariously Liable ; Gelatin Sticks sold illegally without owner’s knowledge: Karnataka High Court
Employee’s action can’t hold License Holders vicariously Liable ; Gelatin Sticks sold illegally without owner’s knowledge: Karnataka High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Karnataka High Court under Justice K Natarajan in P Sunil Kumar & ANR v. State of Karnataka (Criminal Petition No. 8969 of 2022) quashed cr

CONTINUE READING
Merely because the former Husband remarries, the settlement arrived earlier for divorce cannot be questioned: Karnataka HC
Merely because the former Husband remarries, the settlement arrived earlier for divorce cannot be questioned: Karnataka HC
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Karnataka HC has said under Justice M Nagaprasanna in Latha Choodiah v. Shree Balaji H. (Writ Petition No. 11172 of 2019) that remarriage of fo

CONTINUE READING
Gender Stereotype is Unconstitutional: Karnataka High Court
Gender Stereotype is Unconstitutional: Karnataka High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Karnataka High Court has struck down the guidelines on 02.01.23 excluding married daughters from Ex-servicemen Scheme under Justice M Nagaprasa

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka Examination Authority cannot withhold student’s original documents in the absence of enabling rules: Karnataka HC
Karnataka Examination Authority cannot withhold student’s original documents in the absence of enabling rules: Karnataka HC
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Karnataka High court passed a judgement on 27.12.22 under Justice S Sunil Datt Yadav and Justice CM Joshi in Ankit Kumar & others v. State

CONTINUE READING
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in catena of judgments have categorically held that the power to be exercised under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. are extraordinary and ought not to be exercised in a routine manner: Delhi High Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in catena of judgments have categorically held that the power to be exercised under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. are extraordinary and ought not to be exercised in a routine manner: Delhi High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

BAIL APPLN. 3698/2022 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 1511/2022 Mohd Tauseef vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI  The present petition is filed for grant of pre-ar

CONTINUE READING
Plea of the Petitioner that he has become an owner of the subject shop by adverse possession, the said plea is not maintainable in law being mutually destructive with his plea of challenging the ownership rights of the Respondent: Delhi High Court
Plea of the Petitioner that he has become an owner of the subject shop by adverse possession, the said plea is not maintainable in law being mutually destructive with his plea of challenging the ownership rights of the Respondent: Delhi High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team

RC.REV. 359/2018 & CM APPL. 49793/2022 MOHD YASEEN vs GULZAR BEGUM This is an application filed by the Respondent (i.e. the landlady), seeking

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.