Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Irrespective of the Personal Rights of a person or a community, it can under no set of circumstances, override the rights or need of the defence of the country: The Uttarakhand high court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Uttarakhand High Court passed a judgement on 4th of March, 2022 in which it subdued the queries of a division bench, which had a query arising

CONTINUE READING
We are of the view that since a notice under Section 400(1) has been issued, the same should be carried to its logical conclusion in accordance with law: Calcutta High Court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Hamidul Haque v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors. IA No. GA/1/2022 with OCOT/5

CONTINUE READING
The Tribunal has been thorough with regards to facts and has done a commendable job in contractual facilitation while keeping disputes for future deliberation: Calcutta High Court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case Gainwell Commosales Private Limited v. Minsol Limited, APO / 74 /2022 before

CONTINUE READING
EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY BE “PUBLIC SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE KL ACT, THEY ARE NOT “GOVERNMENT SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SAID ACT AS WELL AS CCA RULES SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY BE “PUBLIC SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE KL ACT, THEY ARE NOT “GOVERNMENT SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SAID ACT AS WELL AS CCA RULES SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In this matter S G Padmanabha vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2022( W.P. No.50413 OF 2019 (GM-KLA)) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

CONTINUE READING
THOUGH THERE IS NO HARD AND FAST RULE AS TO HOW MUCH TIME SHOULD BE TAKEN BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR THE GOVERNMENT FOR CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION, THE TIME TAKEN BY THE STATE GOVERNMENT TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION IN THE PRESENT CASE IS INORDINATE AND CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS REASONABLE: SAYS KARNATAKA HC
THOUGH THERE IS NO HARD AND FAST RULE AS TO HOW MUCH TIME SHOULD BE TAKEN BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR THE GOVERNMENT FOR CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION, THE TIME TAKEN BY THE STATE GOVERNMENT TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION IN THE PRESENT CASE IS INORDINATE AND CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS REASONABLE: SAYS KARNATAKA HC
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Mohammed Riyaz vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2022(W.P.H.C. No.74/2022) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VIS

CONTINUE READING
IF THE PETITIONER IS WILLING TO SUBMIT THE DOCUMENTS TO THE AUTHORITY, AS INFORMED BY THE AUTHORITY AND REFERRED TO IN THE COMMUNICATION, THEN THESE DOCUMENTS MAYBE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE AUTHORITY WITHIN 10 DAYS FROM TODAY. IF THE PETITIONER FAILS TO SUBMIT ANY DOCUMENT WITHIN ONE WEEK FROM TODAY, THE RESPONDENTS/AUTHORITIES ARE AT LIBERTY TO TAKE DECISION ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER ON THE MATERIAL WHICH IS AVAILABLE WITH THE AUTHORITY SAYS KARNATAKA HC
IF THE PETITIONER IS WILLING TO SUBMIT THE DOCUMENTS TO THE AUTHORITY, AS INFORMED BY THE AUTHORITY AND REFERRED TO IN THE COMMUNICATION, THEN THESE DOCUMENTS MAYBE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE AUTHORITY WITHIN 10 DAYS FROM TODAY. IF THE PETITIONER FAILS TO SUBMIT ANY DOCUMENT WITHIN ONE WEEK FROM TODAY, THE RESPONDENTS/AUTHORITIES ARE AT LIBERTY TO TAKE DECISION ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER ON THE MATERIAL WHICH IS AVAILABLE WITH THE AUTHORITY SAYS KARNATAKA HC
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Sri K R Narappa vs The Principal Secretary on 23 November, 2022(WRIT PETITION NO.21215 OF 2022 (GM-MMS) presided by THE HON’

CONTINUE READING
HC stays Section 263 order as Mandatory twin pre conditions were prima facie not fulfilled: Gauhati High Court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Gauhati High Court on 19/08/2021 decided the stays Section 263 order as Mandatory twin pre conditions were prima facie not fulfilled. This was seen

CONTINUE READING
MERELY BECAUSE ONE WITNESS HAS TURNED HOSTILE DOES NOT ENTITLE THE PETITIONER TO SEEK BAIL SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Saddam Hussain @ Saddam vs State Of Karnataka on 23 November, 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9337 OF 2022) presided by THE HON’BL

CONTINUE READING
High Court denies pre-arrest bail as petitioner failed to prove genuineness of his GST payment: Gauhati High Court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Gauhati High Court on 27/10/2021 decided that whatever papers submitted by the petitioner to prove the genuineness of his GST payment appears not o

CONTINUE READING
There is nothing which the defendant has been able to demonstrate that there is any plausible defence to the unimpeachable claim of the plaintiff.: Calcutta High Court
December 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Anchor Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. TCI Finance Ltd IA No: GA/2/2019 in CS/133/2019 that

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.