Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The disputed questions of fact, cannot be gone into by the writ court while exercising the power of judicial review vested in it by Article 226 of the Constitution of India.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 23rd of December 2022 in which the court dismissed the petition as it was without

Employee’s action can’t hold License Holders vicariously Liable ; Gelatin Sticks sold illegally without owner’s knowledge: Karnataka High Court
Employee’s action can’t hold License Holders vicariously Liable ; Gelatin Sticks sold illegally without owner’s knowledge: Karnataka High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court under Justice K Natarajan in P Sunil Kumar & ANR v. State of Karnataka (Criminal Petition No. 8969 of 2022) quashed cr

Merely because the former Husband remarries, the settlement arrived earlier for divorce cannot be questioned: Karnataka HC
Merely because the former Husband remarries, the settlement arrived earlier for divorce cannot be questioned: Karnataka HC
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka HC has said under Justice M Nagaprasanna in Latha Choodiah v. Shree Balaji H. (Writ Petition No. 11172 of 2019) that remarriage of fo

Gender Stereotype is Unconstitutional: Karnataka High Court
Gender Stereotype is Unconstitutional: Karnataka High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court has struck down the guidelines on 02.01.23 excluding married daughters from Ex-servicemen Scheme under Justice M Nagaprasa

Karnataka Examination Authority cannot withhold student’s original documents in the absence of enabling rules: Karnataka HC
Karnataka Examination Authority cannot withhold student’s original documents in the absence of enabling rules: Karnataka HC
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High court passed a judgement on 27.12.22 under Justice S Sunil Datt Yadav and Justice CM Joshi in Ankit Kumar & others v. State

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in catena of judgments have categorically held that the power to be exercised under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. are extraordinary and ought not to be exercised in a routine manner: Delhi High Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in catena of judgments have categorically held that the power to be exercised under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. are extraordinary and ought not to be exercised in a routine manner: Delhi High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

BAIL APPLN. 3698/2022 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 1511/2022 Mohd Tauseef vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI  The present petition is filed for grant of pre-ar

Plea of the Petitioner that he has become an owner of the subject shop by adverse possession, the said plea is not maintainable in law being mutually destructive with his plea of challenging the ownership rights of the Respondent: Delhi High Court
Plea of the Petitioner that he has become an owner of the subject shop by adverse possession, the said plea is not maintainable in law being mutually destructive with his plea of challenging the ownership rights of the Respondent: Delhi High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

RC.REV. 359/2018 & CM APPL. 49793/2022 MOHD YASEEN vs GULZAR BEGUM This is an application filed by the Respondent (i.e. the landlady), seeking

The petition seeking equal status to atleast 30% women advocates seeking conferment of Senior Advocate dismissed by Madras High Court
The petition seeking equal status to atleast 30% women advocates seeking conferment of Senior Advocate dismissed by Madras High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Madras High Court In this case writ petition was filed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give equal status to atleast 3

Interim injunction was granted to Viacom-18 by Madras High Court
Interim injunction was granted to Viacom-18 by Madras High Court
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Madras High Court In this case Viacom 18 had approached the court seeking injunction against Internet Service Provider (ISP) for broadcasting the e

Writ petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI ACT: Rajasthan High Court 
Writ petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI ACT: Rajasthan High Court 
January 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Writ petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI ACT: Rajasthan High Court  The High