Sexual Harassment of women in the workplace: The Supreme Court of India.
The Supreme Court of India passed a judgment on 13 August 1997 in which it laid down guidelines to be followed by establishments in dealing with co
Without Exercising Remedy U/S 17 Of SARFAESI Act a Petitioner Cannot File a Writ: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court recently reaffirmed the law’s stance and rejected the petitioner’s writ since the alternate appellate remedy prov
Clubs and Associations Must Have Valid Licenses To Serve Alcohol And Must Not Deviate From Registered Bye-Laws: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court recently denied a club’s request for relief from having to insist on getting a FL2 license in order to permit its membe
Madras High Court grants compensation of ₹5 Lakh to a patient quoting “Hospital’s Failure to Transfer Patient to Another Hospital for Appropriate Care Is Negligence”
In a recent instance, the Madras High Court granted a young woman who had to endure three operations because a government hospital took too long to
Based on their course training, registered homeopathy and ayurveda practitioners in TN are permitted to practise allopathy: Madras High Court
Recent criminal charges against a doctor who was discovered practising allopathy medicine and was registered with the State Homoeopathic Medical Co
S. R Bommai Case (The State Emergency): The Supreme Court of India.
The Supreme Court of India passed a landmark judgment on 28 September 2018 in which it upheld the basic structure doctrine and stopped the center
The National Anthem Case: The Supreme Court of India.
The Supreme Court of India passed a judgment on 11 August 1986 in which it held that the three students were not guilty of disrespecting the Nation
CASE SUMMARY: State (through CBI) v. S.J. Choudhary AIR (1996) 2 SCC 428
ABSTRACT OF THE CASE: This narrative is the case summary of the judgment pronounced by the Supreme Court in State (through CBI) v. S.J. Choudhary;
Trial Court Must Appoint Amicus in the Absence of Defense Counsel, Right of Accused to Representation Is An Essential Part Of Article 21: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court recently stated that the right of the accused to be represented is a fundamental component of Article 21 of the Constitution,
Omission in the charge’s formulation is not fatal by itself unless it caused some prejudice to the accused: Madras High Court
In a judgment dated 05.07.2022, the Madras High Court opined that even if Act 24(2) was not specifically used to formulate the charge, the authorit
